December 22, 2021 · 7:37 am
↓ Jump to Comments

San Mateo County Community College District vice chancellor Jose D. Nuñez in Court today? 9:00 AM 21SF014456A

By Michael G. Stogner

SMCCCD Vice Chancellor Jose D. Nunez

Update: next court date January 5, 2022

Today December 22, 2021 Courtroom 8B at 9:00AM Hon. Judge Chinhayi C. Cadet for Arraignment

SMCCCD Vice Chancellor Jose D. Nunez has been charged with 15 Felony counts, including Embezzlement and PERJURY. He has not been arrested yet. Why? also PER DA AND DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY’S REQUEST. NTA MAY NOT REACH DEFENDANT IN TIME. NTA= Notice to appear, Mr. Nunez might not even know he has been invited to show up in court today. Very casual for a 2.5 year Criminal Investigation. How much did the 2.5 year Investigation cost SMC Taxpayer? Lets compare that to the final outcome of this case, which will most likely never get to a Jury Trial.

Just because a person is criminally charged with a crime in San Mateo County doesn’t mean that he or she is guilty. Look no further than Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez case NF433910A or the Sheriff Activities League (SAL) Embezzlement and Money Laundering case.

The Public is invited to attend in person by Hon. Judge Leland Davis III. Up until November 22, 2021 the public which includes reporters were able to Listen to the Hearing by calling this number 503-300-6847 Code 438807. Remember there is a Pandemic in the world including San Mateo County.

Public Access Policy Updated 11/22/21 – The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect; proceedings are open to the public to attend in person.

I have recommended a Single Point Data Base to San Mateo County Government (SUPERVISORS) for 20 years. Just think how much time and money it would have saved if it caught the alleged Felony on 3/4/2009. Also it would be helpful if the District Attorney’s Office charge all people equally, for example if a Judge, a court clerk, and a court reporter committed a Felony, it would go a long way for Public Trust if they were arrested, charged, and prosecuted. Here are the current charges in the Nunez case.

From today’s hearing:

Disposition Events

12/22/2021  Plea

Judicial Officer Cadet, Chinhayi C.

001
PC424(a)-FEL-Public Officer Crime
Not Guilty
001
PC803(c)-ENH-Special Allegation-Statute Of Limitations-Late Discovery (Zamora Allegation)
Not Guilty
002
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
003
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
004
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
005
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
006
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
007
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
008
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
009
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
010
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
011
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
012
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
013
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
013
PC803(c)-ENH-Special Allegation-Statute Of Limitations-Late Discovery (Zamora Allegation)
Not Guilty
014
EC7054-FEL- Use of School District or College District Funds for Political Purposes
Not Guilty
014
PC803(c)-ENH-Special Allegation-Statute Of Limitations-Late Discovery (Zamora Allegation)
Not Guilty
015
EC7054-FEL- Use of School District or College District Funds for Political Purposes
Not Guilty

Events and Hearings

  • 12/16/2021 Efiling – Initial

  • 12/16/2021 New Filed Case

    12/16/2021 Notice to Appear sent to defendant

    12/22/2021 Arraignment 

    Original TypeArraignmentJudicial OfficerCadet, Chinhayi C.Hearing Time9:00 AMResultArraignedCommentPER DA AND DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY’S REQUEST. NTA MAY NOT REACH DEFENDANT IN TIME.

    Parties Present

    Defendant: Nunez, Jose DAttorney: AGRE, LYN R

    12/22/2021 Advisement of Rights

    12/22/2021 Arraignment waived on complaint

    12/22/2021 Time waiver for preliminary hearing. 

    Comment Defendant personally waived time for 10 court days and 60 calendar days for the preliminary hearing.

    12/22/2021 Defendant ordered to return.

  • 01/05/2022 Superior Court Review 

    Judicial Officer(s) Greenberg, Susan, Southern Superior Court Review, –Hearing Time1:30 PMComment and To Set Prelim

1 Comment

Filed under "We Just Don't Know.", #corruptionmatters, #EqualJusticeMatters, #San Mateo County, #SanMateoCountyisCorrupt., #SanMateoCountyNews, #SanMateoCountyNews.com, Adam Alberti Editor of Climaterwc, Ali Winston Investigative Reporter, Associated Press, “You don’t want to be investigating your own agency.", Board of Supervisors, Britney Spears Case RECORDING, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, California Judicial Branch News Service, Charles Stone, Citizen Journalist, Court Clerk Katrina Bihl, Court Executive Officer Neal I Taniguchi, Court Reporter Jocelyne Fakouri, COVID-19, David Grann, Defense Attorney: LYN R. AGRE, Deputy District Attorney Sean Gallagher, Fair and Level Playing Field, Fixin' San Mateo County, Former SMCCCD Chancellor Ron Galatolo, Hon. Judge Chinhayi C. Cadet, Hon. Judge Joseph Scott, Independent and thorough review of the evidence and the law., Just because somebody says something is True doesn't mean that it is., Kevin Mullin, Making San Mateo County Safer, Michael G. Stogner, Modification of Sentence, Nobody is above the Law except "Those Who Matter", People vs. Juan Pablo Lopez case NF433910A, People vs. Zainali Jaffer 17NF012415A, Perjury, Public Corruption, Public Trust, SAL Embezzlement & Laundering Investigation, SamTrans Fraud Investigation, San Mateo County Community College District, San Mateo County News.com, San Mateo County Sheriff's Office Investigated Itself SAL, Sean Gallagher, Selective Prosecution, Single Point Data Base for Whistleblowers, SMC Brady Officers, SMCDA Inspector William Massey, Stanford University, Steve Wagstaffe, Superior Court of California San Mateo County Assistant Presiding Judge Elizabeth K. Lee, Superior Court of California San Mateo County Presiding Judge Leland Davis III

One response to “San Mateo County Community College District vice chancellor Jose D. Nuñez in Court today? 9:00 AM 21SF014456A”

  1. Brad
    December 24, 2021 at 11:57 pm

    Thank you for the details. Can you please follow up on this and keep up posted on the outcome? Let’s see how many of these officials have their legal fees paid by taxpayers like Galatolo did – to the tune of over $200k and get away with everything!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s