Building Public Trust in California’s Election Infrastructure.

By Michael G. Stogner

From The Little Hoover Commission

January 27, 2022
For Additional Information Contact:
Ethan Rarick, Executive Director
(510) 205-8042
 Lessons from Research: Building Public Trust in California’s Election Infrastructure
Earlier this week, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors unanimously passed legislation that would authorize an open source voting pilot program to be conducted during the November 8, 2022 election in San Francisco.
The legislation now awaits Mayor London Breed’s signature. If signed, the pilot program will also need to be approved by the California Secretary of State before it can be implemented.
Though the Little Hoover Commission noted that California’s elections are extremely secure, we also underscored the importance of bolstering the system even more in our March 2019 letter to the Governor and Legislature and our April 2021 report, California Election Infrastructure: Making a Good System Better.
In Making a Good System Better, the Commission found that California relies on a for-profit model for developing election infrastructure. This model, the Commission also learned, has its limitations. The process to test and re-certify election infrastructure is extensive. Security upgrades for existing models are not incentivized.
To help California better address any security vulnerabilities, the Commission recommended that the state invest in a publicly-owned, open source elections system. In this system, expert “white hat” hackers and interested members of the public could review the source code and report potential vulnerabilities to the California Secretary of State’s Office. Only authorized personnel would be allowed to physically modify the code.
Opening the source code to the public means that not just bad actors can have their eyes on it. More review of the source code means more opportunities to correct security flaws before they impact elections.
Such a system would allow counties to structure their election infrastructure in a way that best suits their needs. They can use this code to create and manage their own voting systems. Or—for a more off-the-shelf solution—counties can work with voting equipment manufacturers to create hardware, service, and support packages.
In addition to its versatility, open source elections systems offer greater financial savings and align with a state goal to use open source software across government.
Along with calling for the adoption of an open source elections infrastructure, the Commission offered several recommendations to help the state make our voting system even more secure:Swap California’s current election audit for risk-limiting audits, a review of randomly selected ballots until the risk limit—a pre-determined chance that a wrong outcome will not be discovered—is reached. Develop a training program for everyone who interacts with election infrastructure. The Secretary of State’s Office should supply understaffed voting jurisdictions with well-trained staff.Create incentives for people to become poll workers, including: Supplementing counties’ base pay with bonuses for people who train to be election workers in historically difficult-to-fill locations. Working with high schools and post-secondary institutions to create applied election administration courses so students can receive course credit for training as an election worker. Allowing and encouraging the state’s 233,000 employees to commit to becoming election workers with enhanced training requirements without having to use their annual leave or vacation time. Mandate compliance audits with standardized reporting procedures and publicly accessible results. California’s election infrastructure is strong. The November 2020 election was the most secure in history. The Commission’s recommendations will help the state build on this strength and keep up with evolving technology and knowledge.
These changes will also increase transparency, allowing California to showcase its strength and help build public trust in the state’s voting systems.

Leave a comment

Filed under # SupervisorsToSupervise, Board of Supervisors, Board of Supervisors President Don Horsley, California Secretary of State’s Office., Mayor London Breed, Open Source, San Francisco Board of Supervisors, San Francisco Board of Supervisors President Shamann Walton, The Little Hoover Commission

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s