Is Defeated Sheriff Carlos Bolanos Contemplating Dancing the Disability Two-step?

By Michael G. Stogner

June 7th’s election signaled a sea change for San Mateo County’s Sheriff’s Office, with challenger Christina Corpus ousting Sheriff Carlos Bolanos. The wake of this defeat has undoubtedly left Carlos Bolanos and his department appointees with a number of pressing decisions, upmost of which is what do I do now?

Undoubtedly, the number one question for Bolanos is will he follow his predecessor and attempt to go out on a lifetime paid medical disability, one in which he will receive an untaxed paycheck with medical benefits for life? When Carlos said to the press, going forward, he needed to speak to his family about his future, is that what he meant?

And if Carlos puts in a workman’s compensation claim, alleging such a disability, one qualifying him for lifetime pay, will the County question it, given the fact that he hadn’t said he couldn’t perform the duties and responsibilities of Sheriff, before losing the election? The County and its governing body, the Board of Supervisors, apparently hadn’t, in the case of Carlos’ predecessor, Sheriff Greg Munks, rubber stamping his exit……. but then again Munks hadn’t lost an election?

Will the board afford Carlos the same golden parachute, realizing the irony of his losing the election, should he allege such a disability? If the Board does, what message would it send to those county employees who have had legitimate claims which the County had contested and or denied? Better yet, what message would that send to county residents, the Board’s employer?

And given Carlos is a Carpetbagger, a person who was not a homegrown County employee and had merely gone from one law enforcement agency to another, accruing & building retirement options, versus his homegrown challenger, Christina Corpus, should the County entertain such a claim and sign off on it?

If Carlos attempts such an exit, shouldn’t that necessarily disqualify him from seeking any further public office? Perhaps not, District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe has ardently supported Bolanos, ever since he (Bolanos) had been detained by the FBI & Las Vegas Metropolitan Police, in 2007, at a human trafficking site, one where indentured sex slaves, to include a minor and the illicit drug ecstasy were being sold. If such embracing of bad behavior by District Attorney Wagstaffe is any indication of things to come then I’d say the citizens of San Mateo county are going to be financially on the hook for Carlos’ exit.

Welcome to San Mateo County


Filed under #CarlosBolanos, 15 years is a long time, A gang is a group or society of associates,, Attorney General Rob Bonta, “officers did come into contact with both Munks and Bolanos inside one of the residences at the brothel.”, “[t]he unlawful activities of […] a highly organized, disciplined association., Board of Supervisors President Don Horsley, Corruption and Organized Crime in San Mateo County., Judges for Bolanos, Local government watchdog Michael G. Stogner, Michael G. Stogner, Organized Crime, SAL Board of Directors, SAL Embezzlement & Laundering Investigation, SMC Supervisor Carole Groom, SMC Supervisor Dave Pine, SMC Supervisor David Canepa, SMC Supervisor Warren Slocum, SMCC Attorney David A. Silberman, The 5 Supervisors are the OVERSIGHT, Victim's Advocate

3 responses to “Is Defeated Sheriff Carlos Bolanos Contemplating Dancing the Disability Two-step?

  1. Mark DePaula

    I just read your article, great statements about Bolanos. Hopefully SMC taxpayers and the State of California will not be on the hook for individuals that get a lifetime paid medical disability, one in which he will receive an untaxed paycheck with medical benefits for life. In the words of D.A. Wagstaffe, “TO THOSE WHO MATTER” in this possible case get the golden egg.

  2. The baseline benefits and retirement package Bolanos has should be more than sufficient. Disability pay would be inappropriate to award without a disability. Running in an re-election campaign provides one would think provides the presumption that a disability does not exist but crazier things have happened in this county.

  3. kunky

    taxpayers if given a chance wouldnt allow these perks

    and by chance I mean if a big deal was made about these perks being wrong !!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s