September 13, 2022 Mark De Paula spoke at the San Mateo County Board of Supervisor Meeting during Public Comment 4:50 mark. He mentioned many very important subjects.
One of those subjects was “Audit SMCC and Pay for the Edais Family Legal Fees.”
Why would Mark De Paula a San Mateo County resident make that suggestion?
He’s talking about this case 21-CIV-04737 | MUSTAFA EDAIS, et al vs. ROBERT FAUCRAULT, et al
He’s requesting an Audit of John Nibbelin, David Silberman and Brian Kulich at the SMCC.
Does anybody know or remember that Mark De Paula placed himself on the ballot of the June 2022 election at the very last moment as a Write-In Candidate for Coroner? Why would he do that when it was Impossible for him to when?
He did it because he had just heard about Munir Edais very suspicious death in his Daly City Apartment sometime between January 19-21, 2020. He said if he was Elected he would turn over all of the data the Coroner’s Office had on the Munir Edais case. He felt that was the least he could do as the Coroner of San Mateo County.
Oversight of the San Mateo County Counsel’s Office, What a Great Idea?
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of San Mateo County. Unless you recognize the sender’s email address and know the content is safe, do not click links, open attachments or reply.
David, the answer is no, please respond to my request.
Michael G. Stogner San Mateo County News.com
On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 04:38:41 PM PDT, David Silberman dsilberman@smcgov.org wrote:
Your request (attached) has been forwarded to me for response. I have some questions regarding the scope of your request, but I am hoping they may turn out to be academic and not require resolution based on what I write below.
I received a similar request to yours (prior to yours) that has been narrowed down to:
Emails to or from each of the five Supervisors and Mike Callagy in the last three months that contain the terms: “Racop”, “Logansport”, “batmobile” or “Anagnostou”.
That requestor is also interested in emails between Steve Wagstaffe and Mike Callagy or the Board. Those will also be provided if they exist. The requestor was also interested in all emails to or from the Sheriff with those terms and I previously conducted an equivalent search and didn’t find any.
Because that Public Records Act request came to me first and underlaps with yours, I am going to work on that one first and then provide you with the same documents I provide that requestor. My hope is that, that search will provide you what you are seeking and/or help us work together to design any subsequent searches. So my proposal is that I do that and then you let me know after you have reviewed that material if you are seeking additional searches. Does that work?
I would observe that although they will be captured by my search, the other requestor is not interested in emails from members of the Public expressing their views of the case. If YOU WANT those emails I need to know NOW so I can flag them when I am conducting my review?
I will observe that communications with the County Attorney’s Office that exist (if any) would likely be exempt under Section 6254(k) of the Government Code and the attorney-client privilege as well as the work product doctrine. Further any emails with the District Attorney that reflect the investigation itself would be exempt under Section 6254(f). Both categories would be withheld from any production.
This is a civil, not a criminal matter, Everybody and their mother knows this.
We already know what did happen, the main question now is why is this case still ACTIVE?
22-SF-008723-A | The People of the State of California vs. MARK RACOP
001 PC532(a)-FEL-Obtaining Money, Labor Or Property By False Pretenses 532(a) Felony 08/01/2020
002 PC484B-FEL-Diversion Of Construction Funds 484B Felony 08/01/2020
I will be there in person because Mark Racop has to fly out from Indiana to say two words, Not Guilty in PERSON in San Mateo County County because a Judge has ordered him to appear in person. He is not allowed to appear on ZOOM for this arraignment hearing. Remember he lives and works in Indiana.
Some of you might have heard of this case since ABC 7 Investigative Reporter Dan Noyes broke the story of the July 19, 2022 Search Warrant being served on Mark Racop at his place of business in Indiana by a four man TEAM of San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office finest. The plan was to arrest Mark Racop and bring him all the way back to San Mateo County to TEACH HIM and others a lesson about the power of the Sheriff’s Office, District Attorney’s Office, Judges, County Counsel and the Supervisors of San Mateo County.
Mark Racop’s case has received worldwide attention because of the Batmobile replica that his company Fiberglass Freaks makes by hand.
The majority of the 22,000 comments made from the 10M VIEWS in 2 months have been similar.
Here are just 2 recent comments:
It’s hard to believe that the Sheriff double down on his stupid actions with a stupid statement that he would ask the same thing of investigators whenever a “Potential Crime” came to his attention. You don’t issue search and arrest warrants for potential crimes, you investigate and come up with some basic evidence to support what your buddy told you. How did a judge get conned into signing these warrants? Did the Sheriff use his friendship with the Judge to influence the warrants? Was the whole story disclosed to the judge? Assuming there was a contract, the purchaser was in breach of contract when he failed to make a timely payment. The consequence of the missed payment was not losing his money or his Batmobile, but merely losing his position in the queue. This is a civil, not a criminal matter.
The sad thing is this is probably the tip of the iceberg when it comes to this sheriff’s corruption. Given that county sheriffs are primarily responsible for property seizures and evictions, there should be an investigation to see if the sheriff misused his authority on behalf of his realtor friend. If so, this story instantly becomes something much bigger and something that should lead to prison sentences for both the sheriff and the realtor.
The Batmobile case has shinned a light on San Mateo County Government when no other case I’m aware of has done. The great news is nobody was Murdered or Executed by the Sheriff’s Office Employees this time.
This behavior is more the norm in San Mateo County, just look at the ret. Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez case and the Edais Family vs. Coroner Robert Foucralt case as current examples.
Please check back for updates as to the Status of this case and the Friday In-person hearing, I hope to see you there.
Would SMC Law Enforcement Officers LIE to get a Search Warrant? Just ask Attorney Tony Serra.
How many times has the (CRP) been activated since its creation in 2008?
Instead of Supervisor President Don Horsley and the 4 other Supervisors opening up who knows how many Looking Into/Report Back, The Attorney General Rob Bonta The Sheriff’s Office & The District Attorney’s Office sort of Investigate something request, and the hiring of a retired Judge Winifred Y. Smith at $650.00 per hour with a $75,000 contract to do Who Knows What.
San Mateo County Government, Just make the Affidavit PUBLIC.
September 13, 2022 the Board of Supervisors held the regular meeting at 9:00 AM.
At the end of public comment BOS President called one of the speakers a LIAR.
This might be one of the reasons the Supervisors are not supposed to respond to Public Comment.
Don Horsley “I never really respond to or talk about public comment, I will on one case.”
” There was a really inflammatory charge about a Deputy Sheriff Murdering somebody, that simply was flat untrue.” Let’s find out who is telling the TRUTH.
I was one of the speakers and I sent this e-mail to Don Horsley yesterday to find out which member of the public he was calling a LIAR and what caused him to make that statement.
Michael Stogner <michaelgstogner@yahoo.com>
To: Don Horsley
Cc: Dave Canepa, Warren Slocum, Dave Pine, Carole Groom, John Nibbelin and 1 more…
Tue, Sep 13 at 12:15 PM
Hello Don,
Right after the public comment you felt compelled to assure the Public that one of the speakers made a statement about a citizen being Murdered by the SMC Sheriff’s Office was completely False.
Can you identify for me who that public speaker was, I’m sure you are not talking about me.
What I said was the VIDEO the Government made Public shows Sandra Lee Harmon was Executed.
Here is that video produced by the Sheriff’s Office and the District Attorney’s Office. I’m guessing you have never bothered to watch it.
For those who have taken the time to VIEW the Government’s Video, KNOW that Sandra Lee Harmon R.I.P. was EXECUTED by San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office Employees on May 5, 2020 in Half Moon Bay, California.
The AXON LOG RECORDS contain the DATA from ALL devices involved. These RECORDS are paid for by the TAXPAYERS. Their sole purpose is to CONFIRM Law Enforcement’s and The Government’s VERSION/STORY of the HOMICIDE.
Sandra Lee Harmon’s arms ARE UP, they don’t appear to be UP they ARE up.
Do you notice the shotgun on the ground?
Do you notice Sandra Lee Harmon is UNARMED?
Do you notice the photo is blurry? that means it has been edited/altered. By WHO?
Omitted from the description is SHOTS being fired at Sandra Lee Harmon.
Sanda Lee Harmon had 3 FATAL SHOTS to the BACK
San Mateo County Counsel Attorney David SilbermanCalifornia Attorney General Rob Bonta
IMHO I would say that San Mateo County Counsel Attorney David Silberman is the person MOST responsible for the AXON LOG RECORDS in the Sandra Lee Harmon Execution on May 5, 2020 in Half Moon Bay, California, NOT being made available to the PUBLIC. Mr. Silberman is an AT-Will Employee.
I would have FIRED him many years ago.
San Mateo County News.com ZOOM meetings Tuesday September 6, 2022 The Public is INVITED and WELCOME.
Michael Stogner is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.
Topic: Michael Stogner’s Zoom Meeting
Time: Sep 6, 2022 12:00 PM Pacific Time (US and Canada)
Three of San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office Finest on Official Business interacting with a civilian, Does anybody see a Body Worn Camera?
Does San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office have a different POLICY for wearing Body Worn Cameras when the Elite Ops TEAM is out of state? This looks like the San Mateo County Gang TASK FORCE.
It’s not a crime for Carlos G. Bolanos to delete his Facebook page, and it’s not a crime to put it back up either. You want to avoid the appearance of GUILT. In a criminal case example this has the appearance of Evidence Tampering. That is a bad look for one of the most powerful Law Enforcement Officials in San Mateo County.
Who is the adult at San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office while Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos is hiding.
Whoever it is Get the Document to Mark Racop’s Bank in Indiana TODAY.
The San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office is responsible for Mark Racop’s Bank account to remain FROZEN. Let’s Fix This Today.
The big guy in the flannel shirt is SMCSO Lt. Michael Leishman FIRE HIM.
All it takes is the actions, such as these, to cause widespread mistrust of an office sworn to “serve and protect”.
The Police Reports should be UNSEALED. There are no protected parties involved (children) just 2 adult males. If the police report that started this entire criminal act by the San Mateo County Gang is false then the person who filed it should pay all costs associated with it. That includes the Law Suit that is sure to be on the way.
The San Mateo County Superior Court Judge who approved the Seizure of Assets should be identified. The documents filed to cause that action should be UNSEALED.
Mark Racop of Indiana should be allowed to appear by ZOOM for his August 19, 2022 court appearance.
Whenever San Mateo County Law Enforcement SEALS records that shouldn’t be sealed, that is a RED FLAG. Always go back to the beginning. What action started this event.
What the Hell is the matter with San Mateo County Residents WAKE UP.
Thank You Dan Noyes
I have to ask did any of 4 San Mateo County Sheriff employees order Pornography at the Hotel in Indiana during this very special Ops event. Everybody and their mother in SMC knows or should know about the very BRAVE female Sheriff Deputy who contacted me for help in early 2010 reporting the 45 Sheriff Employees watching PORN and a VIOLENT RAPE VIDEO on San Mateo County Computers while at work.
San Mateo County Sheriff Christina Corpus starting 2023
The election is over for all the voters that wanted a Woman and a Latina you got what you wanted. As you know San Mateo County News.com did not endorse either Bolanos or Corpus.
The Axon Log Records being released in the Sandra Lee Harmon Execution by Sheriff employees is just one of the many reasons I could not endorse Christina Corpus for Sheriff.
Christina Corpus campaigned on the vague statement the she would have released the Axon Log Records in the Sandra Lee Harmon case if she was the Sheriff.
Caution to viewer, You will see an unarmed woman with her hands above her head and her back facing Sheriff Deputy David Dominguez while he is firing rounds of hollow point bullets at her from a distance of 15 feet. The Sheriff’s Office doesn’t mention that little FACT.
I have been asking Christina Corpus to clarify that statement now that she has won the election, she has not done so. So far she is unwilling to say she WILL release the Axon Log Records her first day in Office.
I think most people understand that Politicians are LIARS, It is not Illegal to LIE in your Campaign Platform.
Looks like Newly Elected Sheriff of San Mateo County Christina Corpus is a Politician.
San Mateo County News 