Category Archives: Coronavirus

Judge Leland Davis III, Court Excetuive Officer Neil Taniguchi, might want to get on same page with Sheriff Bolanos.

By Michael G. Stogner

Judge Davis III and Neil Taniguchi came up with the bright idea to cancel the Public Telephone access to the Courts in the middle of a raging Pandemic.

Public Access Policy
Updated 11/22/21 – The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect; proceedings are open to the public to attend in person.

At this time, members of the public may attend a court proceeding in person.

At the very same time the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office issued this a few hours ago. This Jail is connected to the Courthouse that the public is invited to attend in PERSON.

NEWS RELEASE

Incident Date and Time: 01/06/2022
Location: San Mateo County Correctional Facilities Type of Crime/Incident: Covid 19/Omicron Update

Summary:

The following procedures have been implemented by the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office and San Mateo County Correctional Health Services at our correctional facilities to protect our employees and incarcerated people from Covid-19/Omicron.

o All in-person visiting is canceled until further notice. Exception: Attorney visits and court-ordered visits.

o All staff is required to wear N-95 or KN-95 masks inside all correctional facilities.
o All incarcerated people are required to wear their masks when outside their cell.
o All incarcerated people going to court are required to wear an N-95 or KN-95 mask.
o All in-person programs have been canceled until further notice.
o No in-person meetings or large gatherings (except emergencies).
o Newly arrived incarcerated people will be quarantined per CDC guidelines. This will be

to ensure none of the incarcerated people have developed symptoms of Covid-19.
o In the event an incarcerated person shows signs of Covid-19, the Correctional Staff will

collaborate with Correctional Health Services to implement a quarantine plan for that

housing area as deemed necessary.
o If you have the following symptoms, please refrain from entering the correctional

lobbies. Fever, cough, difficulty breathing, and shortness of breath and please contact

your medical provider.
o The San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office will continue to collaborate with the San Mateo

County Correctional Health Services to ensure our employees and the incarcerated

people are provided the most up-to-date information and protection from Covid-19. o Incarcerated people will attend video court inside their housing units except for those

who are required to attend in person.
o All correctional staff are required to take COVID tests once per week. All arrestees will

be screened outside of the facility. This will consist of a pre-booking questionnaire and

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER • DETECTIVE JAVIER ACOSTA • 650-363-4800 • PIO@SMCGOV.ORG 400 COUNTY CENTER • REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063 • 650-421-1243 • https://www.smcsheriff.com

an intensive medical screening. If an arrestee is displaying symptoms of Covid-19 and is medically cleared, they will be isolated.

Thank you for your patience and understanding during this challenging time.

Written by: Detective Javier Acosta Release Date: 01/06/2022

1 Comment

Filed under #newsbreak, #SanMateoCountyNews.com, CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Citizen Journalist, Coronavirus, Court Executive Officer Neal I Taniguchi, Court Executive Officer: Neal I. Taniguchi, COVID-19, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019, David Khan of Daly City, PANDEMIC, San Mateo County Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos, SMCSO Detective Javier Acosta, Superior Court of California San Mateo County Assistant Presiding Judge Elizabeth K. Lee, Superior Court of California San Mateo County Presiding Judge Leland Davis III

Family Court Judges, Rule on Unvaccinated Parents and Children. “This child needs to be protected.”

By Michael G. Stogner

Everybody and their mother knew this day was coming, as if Family Law Courts were not expensive enough as they are. But this is an issue that the parents are bringing on themselves. Judges around the Country are making rulings to protect the Children when one of the Parents chooses not too. Also now being Vaccinated is part of the Custody equation. If a parent refuses to get vaccinated or refuses to get his/her children vaccinated it could/will impact the outcome of which parent gets custody.

Today LATIMES Article

Family courts weigh in on vaccinations
What happens when one divorced parent hasn’t gotten the shot? Judges take up issue.
By Emily Alpert Reyes
Flanked by their lawyers, the divorced parents hashed out an agreement outside the Pasadena courtroom and returned to inform the judge: They had agreed their young son would get the COVID-19 vaccine.
“Absolutely he needs to be vaccinated,” Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Harvey A. Silberman said.
Then he asked the parents: “Are the two of you vaccinated?”
The mother said yes. The father said no. “Sir, you better get vaccinated,” the judge said, according to a court transcript. “Or you could very well lose time with your child unless you have a medical reason not to.”
As children and teens have become eligible for COVID-19 shots, divorced parents have clashed in court over whether to get kids vaccinated. In some cases — including the one now before a judge in Los Angeles County — family courts have also started to weigh in on parents being vaccinated against the coronavirus.
In Illinois, a judge made headlines after ruling that a mother could not see her 11-year-old son until she had gotten vaccinated, a decision that was later rescinded.
In New York, a father was suspended from visits unless he got vaccinated or underwent regular testing. “The danger of voluntarily remaining unvaccinated during access with a child while the COVID-19 virus remains a threat to children’s health and safety cannot be understated,” Judge Matthew F. Cooper wrote.
Attorney Lloyd C. Rosen, who represents the New York father, said his client is getting tested regularly in order to keep seeing his daughter but has filed a notice to preserve his right to appeal the ruling.
Rosen argued that the court had overstepped. Vaccinations and other medical decisions often come up in custody cases, since “it’s not uncommon for parents to disagree regarding medical care or treatment for a child,” he said.
“Here the court is not stepping in and making a decision for the child that the parents can’t make,” Rosen said.
“The court here is stepping in and making a decision for a parent regarding themselves — as a condition to their parental rights.”
Cooper, the judge in that case, wrote that the question was not whether he could require an adult to be vaccinated, which “would stretch the authority of a matrimonial court to unprecedented lengths,” but whether the mother could make vaccination or testing a condition of the father visiting the child.
At the L.A. County hearing, the divorced father said he had medical reasons for not being vaccinated, but Silberman seemed skeptical. In a court order, he directed the father to either provide a medical exemption from his doctor or show that he had gotten vaccinated against COVID-19.
If the father genuinely has a health reason for not getting vaccinated, “I want to know what the medical evidence is,” Silberman said during the hearing. “This child needs to be protected.”
The move surprised attorney Patrick Baghdaserians, who represents the mother. Although Baghdaserians said he is aware of judges supporting COVID-19 shots for children when the issue has arisen in custody cases, “I’ve never seen a judge take the next step, which is … if one of the parents is not vaccinated, that potentially exposes the child to harm.”
Baghdaserians praised the judge and said that if the order were ignored, his client would seek to change the custody arrangement. The mother is supportive of COVID-19 vaccination, he said.
Attorney Alphonse Provinziano, who represents the father, said his client had asked him not to comment on his specific case. He said that in general, California family courts have wide latitude to seek information from parents, but he was unaware of any legal authority for them to change custody based on vaccination status.
Provinziano said it’s possible that someone could try to make such a case by arguing that, “ ‘Well, I don’t think it’s in the best interests of the child’ ” for a parent to not be vaccinated. But “that, I think, would end up going to the Supreme Court of California. … It would be a heavily litigated case.”
Provinziano also argued that, in general, if a parent has a medical reason to not be vaccinated, “you can’t use that disability to say that you’re somehow unable to be a parent to your child.” He pointed to a California ruling that found courts cannot use a physical disability as evidence of whether someone is a fit parent.
The Times is not naming the parents involved in the court case in order to protect the privacy of their child.
In response to questions sent for the judge, a Los Angeles County Superior Court spokeswoman said Silberman was prohibited under ethics canons from making any public comments on a pending case.
Rachel Rebouché, interim dean at Temple University Beasley School of Law, said most state statutes that govern child custody are very broad, centering on “the best interests of the child.”
For instance, courts have been able to restrict visitation rights if a parent lives with a partner who is deemed unsafe for the child, Rebouché said.
In California, courts scrutinize the ability of parents to care for the child, she said, so “whether or not the parent will seek to protect the child from COVID is relevant to the court.”
Still, Rebouché said the L.A. County case and others raise questions about “where are the lines that you draw for what courts can permissibly require parents to do with threat of a custody loss.”
If some people see not getting vaccinated as an issue of religious freedom, “is losing time with a child a denial of that right? Or is it something else?” she asked.
John F. Banzhaf III, professor emeritus of public interest law at George Washington University Law School, argued that there is a strong precedent for courts’ limiting visitation for unvaccinated parents: child custody cases involving cigarette smokers. Family courts have ordered parents who smoke to stop doing so in their homes for 24 or 48 hours before a child visits, Banzhaf said.
In some cases, judges have denied custody to a parent because “the very fact that you would continue smoking around the child, knowing the risk, knowing how widely publicized the risks are, suggests to me a lack of concern” for their health, Banzhaf said.
The legal debate revolves around the protective effects of the vaccines not just for the recipient, but for children and teens around them. Vaccinated people can spread the virus, but health officials have stressed they are much less likely to get infected in the first place, reducing the likelihood they will pass it along.
Rosen, the attorney representing the New York father, argued that even if the father got vaccinated, that would not eliminate the possibility of him getting and transmitting the coronavirus. He also noted that the child goes to day care with other children.
“There’s just so many different ways this child could be exposed to COVID that to single out the father and make his access conditional upon his vaccination status is not only inappropriate, but well beyond any kind of reasonable determination in the best interests of the child,” Rosen said.
Banzhaf argued there was strong evidence for the risks posed to a child by spending time inside with an unvaccinated parent. In fact, he said, “the evidence is far clearer than we used to have with regard to secondhand tobacco smoke” in custody cases.
What will happen for the father in the L.A. County court case remains to be seen. Silberman gave the man roughly a month to provide the documents he requested, which he would review privately.
At the November hearing, Silberman told the father, “I hope you do have a genuine health reason for preventing you from getting” the vaccine. “I just want to know what that is.”

This was totally Predictable, I recommend every person read the Crimson Contagion Functional Exercise of 2019. I did in March 2020.

Best of Health to everyone.

Leave a comment

Filed under "Danger of remaining unvaccinated", "Threat to Childrens Health and Safety, #newsbreak, #SanMateoCountyNews.com, Associated Press, “Are the two of you vaccinated?”, “Sir, you better get vaccinated,”, “The court here is stepping in and making a decision for a parent regarding themselves — as a condition to their parental rights.”, California Judicial Branch News Service, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, Citizen Journalist, Coronavirus, COVID-19, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019, Google, John Myers LATIMES, Judge Matthew F. Cooper, LATIMES Reporter Emily Alpert Reyes, Local Media Consortium, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Harvey A. Silberman, Making San Mateo County Safer, Michael G. Stogner, Newsbreakapp.com, Particle Media Inc, prnewsonline.com, Protect the Children, Protect the Residents of California

Aldon Smith, x49er, xRaider, xSeahawks, xDallas Cowboy, in San Mateo County Court Today.

By Michael G. Stogner

21-SM-014538-A

Aldon Smith needs HELP not Enablers.

TMZ Sports was first to report his December 6, 2021 arrest by the CHP in Redwood City,

Details surrounding the arrest are unclear.” Welcome to San Mateo County, That is the first of many RED FLAGS.

Aldon Smith might have been kicked off of several NFL TEAMS but he is on the “Those Who Matter” TEAM, in SMC. That is the Last Thing he needs.

His Defense Attorney Joshua Bentley is most likely on his cell phone speed dial. Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos and District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe numbers are on Joshua Bentley’s speed dial.

TMZ reported “Details surrounding the arrest are unclear.” How is that possible in 2021. What could be unclear about an arrest that takes place around 2:30 PM and Booked in jail at 7:38 PM. Where was Aldon Smith for those 5 hours?

What date and time did San Mateo County Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos provide the 760,000 residents with a Press/News Release of Aldon Smith’s ARREST for DUI BAC .288 which is over 3 times the legal limit? Sheriff Bolanos Never did provide that information, WHY?

In 2018 Aldon Smith was arrested for DUI with a BAC of .40 which is 5 times the legal limit, and that happened with him wearing a SCRAM device.

Why did San Mateo County District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe file this FELONY criminal case as a Misdemeanor? 21-SM-014538-A The People of the State of California vs. Aldon Jacarus Ramon Smith

The “Those Who Matter” TEAM also includes Superior Court of California County of San Mateo Judges.

November 22, 2021 the Court Public Access Telephone Service has been discontinued. The SMC Judges Invite you to attend in PERSON. I recommend any member of the public who is considering going into the 400 County Center Building, in Redwood City, California, First Google the word PANDEMIC.

This case is being heard at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 8B by the Hon. Judge Stephanie Garratt.

Hon. Judge Stephanie Garratt is the Judge that on July 2, 2018 GRANTED the San Mateo County District Attorney Office MOTION to DISMISS the ENTIRE Zainali Jaffer criminal case AFTER it had already had a Preliminary Hearing and evidence and testimony was heard and ALL CHARGES were approved.

Don’t expect this Felony Criminal Case to go much different, than the Sheriff Sergeant Lou Aquino DUI case, the Zainali Jaffer Criminal Case, or the San Mateo County Sheriff Activities League (SAL) Embezzlement & Money Laundering Criminal Case with Barbara Bonilla being the only person charged when there were others.

I’ll post update as soon as I get it.

Leave a comment

Filed under #2americas, #closeSMCcourtsuntilfixed, #corruptionmatters, #EqualJusticeMatters, #fostercitynews, #prosecutorialmisconductmatters, #SanMateoCountyNews, #SanMateoCountyNews.com, 21-SM-014538-A | The People of the State of California vs. Aldon Jacarus Ramon Smith, Aldon Jacarus Ramon Smith, Aldon Smith, Attorney Josh Bentley, Attorney Patrick Clancy, Barbara Bonilla, Bay Area Transparency, Bay Cities News Foundation, Booking Photo, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, California Highway Patrol, California Judicial Branch News Service, California PAL, CDC, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, Citizen Journalist, City of Redwood City, Coronavirus, Correct the Record and Synchronize it with the known Facts, COVID-19, Fair and Level Playing Field, First Chance, FIRST CHANCE SOBERING STATION AND OUTPATIENT SERVICES, Former Raider, Former San Francisco 49er, Former Seattle Sea Hawk, Hon Stephanie Garratt, Just because somebody says something is True doesn't mean that it is., Making San Mateo County Safer, Michael G. Stogner, Nobody is above the Law except "Those Who Matter", Public Corruption, Recordings of Court Cases Must be Allowed, San Francisco 49ers, San Mateo County District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe, San Mateo County News.com, San Mateo County Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos, sanfrancisco.cbslocal, Selective Prosecution, Sheriff Captain Christina Corpus Investigated SAL, SMCSO Sergeant Lou Aquino, Superior Court of California San Mateo County Assistant Presiding Judge Elizabeth K. Lee, Superior Court of California San Mateo County Presiding Judge Leland Davis III, The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect, Those Who Matter, TMZ, TMZ Sports, Victim's Advocate

X 49er Aldon Smith BAC was reported to be .288

By Michael G. Stogner

21-SM-014538-A

This is a “Those who Matter” case, San Mateo County Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos provided NO BOOKING PHOTO or PRESS/NEWS RELEASE of the arrest. Why?

That is the first Tell. The 2nd Tell is Defense Attorney Josh Bentley, The 3rd Tell District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe filed this case as a Misdemeanor 21-SM instead of a 21-SF which is a FELONY.

Smith declined a field sobriety test but later took a blood test that showed a blood-alcohol content of .288 percent, District Attorney Stephen Wagstaffe confirmed Thursday. Smith spent the night in jail. (source San Jose Mercury News Michael Nowels)

By declining a sobriety test at the scene, you forfeit California Drivers License for 1 year, unless you are one of the “Those Who Matter” TEAM.

If he was a BAC of .288 why is he charged with a 0.08?

San Mateo County has a First Chance DUI program for 1st time offenders. To my knowledge it does not have a 4th or 5th Chance DUI Program.

San Mateo County does have Defense Attorney Josh Bentley, Watch this case, it is going to be exciting.

TMZ was the first to report the arrest on December 6, 2021.

When I say watch this case, I mean show up to Court IN PERSON. A reasonable thinking person would know that there is a COVID-19 Pandemic in San Mateo County at this time. Listening by phone to the Court Hearings would be a lot safer you would think. Superior Court of California County of San Mateo Presiding Judge Leland Davis III thinks just the opposite. He cancelled Public Access by Telephone on November 22, 2021.

If you do attend the next Court date don’t be surprised if Aldon Smith and Josh Bentley appear remotely for safety reasons. Who would blame them. Stay Safe

Next court date January 4, 2022

1 Comment

Filed under #closeSMCcourtsuntilfixed, #corruptionmatters, #prosecutorialmisconductmatters, #SanMateoCountyNews.com, #SMCJUSTICE, 21-SM-014538-A | The People of the State of California vs. Aldon Jacarus Ramon Smith, Aldon Jacarus Ramon Smith, Aldon Smith, Apnews.com, Associated Press, Attorney Josh Bentley, Axios.com, Bay Area Transparency, Bay Cities News Foundation, bloomberg.com, Booking Photo, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, California Judicial Branch News Service, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, Citizen Journalist, City of Redwood City, Colin Kaepernick, Coronavirus, Court Clerk Katrina Bihl, Court Executive Officer Neal I Taniguchi, Court Reporter Jocelyne Fakouri, COVID-19, Deputy District Attorney Sean Gallagher, Facebook, Fair and Level Playing Field, FIRST CHANCE SOBERING STATION AND OUTPATIENT SERVICES, Fixin' San Mateo County, Former San Francisco 49er, Foster City News, Google, Hon. Judge Joseph Scott, https://missionlocal.org, John Myers LATIMES, June 7, 2018 The Private Meeting at the District Attorney's Office, Just because somebody says something is True doesn't mean that it is., KQED, MADD, Making San Mateo County Safer, Michael G. Stogner, Never too late to Investigate, Newsbreakapp.com, newsbreezer.com, Nobody is above the Law except "Those Who Matter", Organized Crime, Outrageous Government Conduct, People vs. Juan Pablo Lopez case NF433910A, People vs. Zainali Jaffer 17NF012415A, Perjury, Public Corruption, Public Trust, Recordings of Court Cases Must be Allowed, Retired RWCPD Officer James (Jim) McGee, RICO, Rob Bonta Attorney General of California, S.F. Gate, SAL Embezzlement & Laundering Investigation, SamTrans Fraud Investigation, San Francisco 49ers, San Jose Mercury News, San Mateo County District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe, San Mateo County News.com, San Mateo County Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos, San Mateo County Sheriff Lt. Andrew Armando, San Mateo County Sheriff Michael Otte Committed Perjury., San Mateo County Sheriff's Office Press Release, sanfrancisco.cbslocal, Selective Prosecution, Sheriff Sergeant Luis Dejesus Aquino for DUI, SMCSO Sergeant Irfan Zaidi, SMCSO Sgt. Jason Peardon, Superior Court of California San Mateo County Presiding Judge Leland Davis III, The Auditor, The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect, Those Who Matter, TMZ, TMZ Sports, Victim's Advocate, Vungle, When government is the enemy, x Sheriff Deputy Colin Troy Smith, x Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez Case RECORDING., Yahoo, YouTube Channel, Zain Jaffer, Zain Jaffer case Preliminary Hearing SEALED.

Kaylan Charles Freeman in Court July 14, 2021, 9:00 AM

By Michael G. Stogner

Update: 9:00 AM Phone 1-503-300-6847 Code 438807

21-SF-001757-A-HTA | The People of the State of California vs. KAYLAN CHARLES FREEMAN 

21-SF-001757-A | The People of the State of California vs. KAYLAN CHARLES FREEMAN 

This is the Nine Year Rape/Sexual Assault Investigation by San Mateo County Sheriff Office if you believe Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos and Public Information Officer Rosemerry Blankswade.

The Sheriff’s Office had been building the case since 2013 when the first victim in the county came forward. Sheriff’s Office spokeswoman Rosemerry Blankswade said the initial reports were “unfortunately vague or didn’t include a lot of detail.” And it wasn’t until a case linked to Freeman surfaced in a neighboring jurisdiction, coupled with a witness identifying Freeman, that the San Mateo County investigation was reinvigorated.

The Sheriff’s Office claim is that they had no idea who he was until January 2021.

Here is why that statement is Impossible to be true.

On April 3, 2014 at 11:25 AM San Mateo County Sheriff Sergeant Ceferino Gonzales served Kaylan Charles Freeman with a Temporary Restraining Order and Notice to Appear in San Mateo County Superior Court on April 17, 2014 in Honorable Judge Joseph Scott’s Courtroom. He was served at the same El Granada residence that he was recently arrested at.

That means Kaylan Freeman was properly served by a SMCSO Sergeant 15 days before the Hearing date.

SMCSO Sergeant C. Gonzales signed the Proof of Service on April 18, 2014 one day after the Hearing was removed from Calendar reason NO PROOF OF SERVICE FILED.

Proof of Service is a very important part of the Legal Process. It not rocket science the server must by at least 18 years old, the person being served must be served at least 5 days before the hearing date, and Proof of Service must be filed with the Court before the Hearing date in order to proceed.

Why did SMCSO Sergeant Gonzales sign the POS the day after the Hearing date?

Why did SMCSO Sergeant Gonzales file it with the Court 5 days after he signed it?

How many San Mateo County young girls and young women have been Raped and or Sexually Assaulted since 2012 because of the Sheriff’s Office reckless regard for their safety.

Kaylan Charles Freeman is in SMC Jail on $5,250,000.00 Bail.

Attorney General Rob Bonta should add this to his long list of things to do.

Note: For those of you who would like to listen, I will publish the Phone number and Code on this article as soon as it is known which Courtroom is hearing this case.

3 Comments

Filed under #newsbreak, #SanMateoCountyNews.com, Bay Area Transparency, Bay Cities News Foundation, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, California Judicial Branch News Service, Citizen Journalist, Coronavirus, https://missionlocal.org, Just because somebody says something is True doesn't mean that it is., Kaylan Charles Freeman, Local Media Consortium, metro.co.uk, Michael G. Stogner, New Media Investment Group, Newsbreakapp.com, newsbreezer.com, Nobody is above the Law except "Those Who Matter", Police Officers Committing Crimes, prnewsonline.com, Protect the Children, Public Corruption, Recordings of Court Cases Must be Allowed, San Mateo County District Attorney Inspector Jordan Boyd, San Mateo County District Attorney Office, San Mateo County News.com, San Mateo County Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos, sanfrancisco.cbslocal, Single Point Data Base for Whistleblowers, SMC Brady Officers, SMCSO Det. Rosemerry Blankswade, SMCSO Sergeant Ceferino J. Gonzales, Telephone Public Access Discontinued by Who knows Who., The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect, Those Who Matter, Victim's Advocate, Yahoo, Yahoo Search

Supervisor President David Canepa is Silent.

By Michael G. Stogner

SMC Board of Supervisor’s President David Canepa

San Mateo County Supervisor David Canepa is well known for his Interviews and Opinions in front to the television cameras. His opinions on the COVID-19 Pandemic have been like a Roller-Coaster up and down and all over the place.

Yahoo/Sent

  • Michael Stogner <michaelgstogner@yahoo.com>To:Dave Canepa,Bill Silverfarb,Dave Pine,Don Horsley,Carole Groom and 2 more… Sun, Jan 17 at 8:33 AM
  • Hello Dave,
    Can you tell me how many long term care residents have received the first and second doses of the COVID-19 Vaccine as of today?
    How many long term care residents does SMC have?
    Last weeks Burlingame’s Facility outbreak brought back memories for me personally, that is where my father spent the last days of his life.
    I think we can agree this population is the most likely to fill the Hospital ICU beds once they get COVID-19 and most likely to die.

  • Thank You, in advance for your response.
    Michael G. Stogner, San Mateo County News.com

I will publish the answer as soon as I get it.

1 Comment

Filed under "We Just Don't Know.", #2americas, #lessthanlivesmatter, #novaccinenocure, #SanMateoCountyNews, #stayhomesavelives, #WEARAMASK, Bill Silverfarb, Board of Supervisors, Carole Groom, CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Citizen Journalist, Coronavirus, COVID-19, COVID-19 Testing, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019, Dave Pine, Don Horsley, No Cure, No Treatment, No Vaccine, San Mateo County Health, SMC Citizen Advocate Brent Turner, Stay in Home Order, Victim's Advocate, Warren Slocum

Do Not Board a Commercial Aircraft in America.

By Michael G. Stogner

At this time that is my opinion. Remember under the current leadership of America we were the last Country in the entire world to ground the Boeing 737 Max. We should have been the first. The FAA has failed to protect the public. There is a Pandemic raging and most Americans have heard about it by now. The simple reality is the Federal Government, FAA, TSA, Airlines, Flight Crews can not protect you and your loved ones. It is YOUR responsibility to protect Yourself it always has been. Consider this what if there is No hospital to go to if you get sick?

Stay Safe, Best of Health to you and your loved ones.

Today’s LATIMES.

Visibly ill people are still boarding planes
Recent fatal in-flight incident is only one example. A database reveals safety gaps.
AIRLINES boast layers of protocols intended to protect fliers from the coronavirus. Above, the cabin of a United Airlines jet is disinfected before passengers are allowed on at Los Angeles International Airport in July. (Mel Melcon Los Angeles Times) A PASSENGER service representative for Avianca Airlines takes the temperature of Eva Zapata at LAX before her flight to El Salvador in November. (Al Seib Los Angeles Times)
By Hugo Martín
Before boarding a flight from Orlando to Los Angeles, Isaias Hernandez filled out a health checklist provided by United Airlines, asserting that he had not been diagnosed with COVID-19 and had not shown any of the disease’s symptoms in the previous two weeks.
But during the flight, the 69-year-old Angeleno collapsed. Three passengers gave him CPR for nearly an hour in the aisle of the plane, and the flight was diverted to Louisiana, where Hernandez was pronounced dead. The coroner’s report listed the cause as “acute respiratory failure, COVID-19.”
The Dec. 14 incident illustrates the deficiencies in the systems that are meant to prevent people from bringing the coronavirus aboard commercial flights and potentially spreading it to the people packed in around them. And it happened as holiday air travel ramped up. In the days surrounding Christmas, more than a million passengers boarded planes almost daily, reaching 1.3 million last Sunday — the most since March.
U.S. airlines boast layers of protocols intended to protect passengers from the virus, including the increased cleaning of plane cabins and a requirement that passengers wear face coverings except when eating or drinking. Nearly all of them also require passengers to fill out a health declaration before boarding. But the only repercussion for lying on the declaration or refusing to wear a mask on the plane is getting banned from the airline, if caught .
How often people with COVID-19 board planes is impossible to know.
Federal rules require airline pilots to report to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention any deaths or illnesses aboard interstate and international flights, and in March, the CDC updated its guidance reminding pilots of that duty.
But on Thursday, the CDC told The Times that it does not keep track of the pilots’ reports. The U.S. Transportation Department and the Federal Aviation Administration said they don’t keep track of COVID-19 cases on planes either.
Flight attendants are asked to be on the lookout for symptoms — coughing, sneezing, high body temperature — but airline representatives say they can’t evaluate every passenger.
Only a few airlines, such as Avianca and Frontier , take the temperature of each passenger before boarding.
Some U.S. airports, including Los Angeles International Airport, take the extra step of using thermal cameras to gauge people’s temperatures as they enter the terminal, but fliers are allowed to opt out.
The CDC launched an enhanced screening program last January for international passengers arriving to the U.S. from certain countries with widespread transmission of the virus. But it ended the program in November, concluding that the effort failed, partly because COVID-19 has too many symptoms that are also common to other illnesses; travelers could mask their symptoms to avoid detection; and even travelers with no symptoms can still carry and spread the virus.
What is needed, passenger rights advocates, flight attendant unions and academics say, is for the U.S. Department of Transportation to adopt uniform standards for airline safety, including a mask mandate that is enforced with steep fines.
They also call on the federal agency to put more resources into contact tracing of known cases and improved access to quick and reliable COVID-19 tests that passengers can take before a flight.
“Without health security rules by [the Transportation Department], air travel will continue to spread COVID,” said Paul Hudson, president of Flyersrights.org, an airline passenger rights group with more than 60,000 members.
The Trump administration has been reluctant to impose airline screening and safety requirements, opting instead to let each carrier and airport create and enforce their own individual policies.
“Unless that message is coming from the top, it’s really hard to take action,” said Jan L. Jones, a professor of hospitality and tourism at the University of New Haven.
The tragedy on the Dec. 14 United Airlines flight was only the latest reported incident in which a passenger boarded a plane despite showing COVID-19 symptoms or testing positive for the coronavirus.
In late November, a Hawaii couple who tested positive for the virus were told to isolate in San Francisco but instead boarded a plane to Kauai, where they were arrested on suspicion of reckless endangerment, police said.
Several other incidents involving passengers who showed COVID-19 symptoms on flights have been reported to an aviation safety reporting database operated by NASA . The reports in the database are filed anonymously by pilots and flight attendants, with the exact dates and airlines’ names omitted to protect the tipsters’ privacy.
The database was created so NASA can report safety problems to aviation manufacturers and operators without putting those companies’ employees at risk of reprisal for flagging the problems.
According to a report in the database filed in October, the pilot of a commercial flight was alerted to a female passenger who complained of extreme pain while the plane was at cruising altitude. The pilot offered to divert the flight to the nearest airport to get her immediate medical attention, but she said she was feeling better after an EMT on the flight gave her oxygen.
“While she received attention on the plane, the passenger stated that she had been exposed to COVID in the last three days,” the pilot said in the report, which offered few other details.
On a flight in May, a pilot reported being notified by a flight attendant that a male passenger was “coughing, sneezing, not wearing a mask, and he refused to wear a mask despite repeated attempts by her to give him one.” The plane had just pulled away from the gate, the pilot reported.
The flight attendants also said that other passengers were starting to panic because the coughing passenger had gotten up about five times to use the lavatory, the pilot wrote.
“During a global pandemic, a visibly sick passenger was able to get through check-in, security, walk through the terminal, past a gate agent, and onto an airplane with … other passengers and … crew members,” the pilot wrote.
In August, a pilot reported that just before departure, a flight attendant said a passenger was coughing, not wearing a mask and had just vomited on himself.
“I made the decision that the person was not suitable for a [long] flight and was to be removed,” the pilot said in the report.
In other incidents, pilots and flight attendants fault their colleagues and employers.
A pilot reported to the database in September that a flight attendant had been feeling ill but had not disclosed her symptoms to the pilot or other crewmates. She later tested positive for COVID-19, the pilot said.
“Lack of communication and transparency from the [flight attendant] about her preexisting health condition led to the compromised safety of passengers and fellow flight crew,” the pilot wrote.
In April, two flight attendants reported that even though a passenger on one of their recent flights had tested positive for the coronavirus, their airline ordered them to show up for duty a few days later.
“The company refused to give us alternate travel despite being potential carriers,” one of the flight attendants wrote in their report in the NASA database. “We were not granted assurance of tests upon landing, or that we would be given leave to quarantine for the full recommended 14 days to allow for symptoms to manifest or not.”
But it’s the case on last month’s United Airlines flight — with Hernandez collapsing in view of other travelers, and with the attempts to revive him caught on video and posted online — that has painted the most vivid and accessible picture of the problem.
United Airlines said Hernandez “acknowledged on our Ready-to-Fly checklist that he had not been diagnosed with COVID-19 and did not have COVID-related symptoms.” The airline said it realized only after Hernandez died that he had “wrongly acknowledged this requirement.”
Hernandez had preexisting health conditions, including high blood pressure and upper respiratory issues, and was feeling sick leading up to the day of travel, the airline said in a statement.
Hernandez collapsed early in the flight. At least three passengers with medical training, including Tony Aldapa, an off-dutyemergency medical technician from Los Angeles, performed CPR on him in the aisle.
Passengers overhead Hernandez’s wife telling Aldapa that Hernandez had COVID-related symptoms, including loss of taste and smell, according to United Airlines. At least one posted about it on Twitter, prompting hundreds of responses of outrage and panic.
Despite the comments by Hernandez’s wife, the plane was not disinfected immediately after Hernandez was removed, and the flight continued to Los Angeles, the airline said.
At the time, the crew believed Hernandez suffered a heart attack and offered the passengers the option to take a later flight, United Airlines spokesman Charles Hobart said. All the passengers opted to stay on the plane, he said.
Hobart said that the CDC contacted United Airlines and that the carrier provided the information needed to notify the passengers on the flight that they may have been exposed to the virus.

Leave a comment

Filed under #stayhomesavelives, #WEARAMASK, CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Citizen Journalist, Coronavirus, COVID-19, COVID-19 Testing, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019, Dr. Scott Morrow, FAA, Michael G. Stogner, No Cure, No Treatment, No Vaccine, Outrageous Government Conduct, San Francisco International Airport, San Mateo County, San Mateo County SFO International Airport, TSA Agents, U.S. Department of Transportation's Inspector General, Victim's Advocate

Dr. Scott Morrow “The Impossible Task.”

By Michael G. Stogner

Dr. Scott Morrow

Without Enforcement it doesn’t matter what Dr. Scott Morrow says. Everybody knows that. It’s always been that way, This should be No surprise to any reasonable thinking person in San Mateo County.

Dr, Scott Morrow Public Statement made yesterday December 7, 2020. I have picked out some key statements.

“This is a horrible, nasty and lethal virus that is highly transmissible and one you do not want to get. To get out of this situation depends on all of us.”

I have no intent to fault the state on their impossible task.

The power and authority to control this pandemic lies primarily in your hands, not mine,” he said. 

Morrow called the new shelter orders “symbolic gestures” which lack enforcement.

“The structure of our economy is, for the most part, if you don’t work, you don’t eat or have a roof over your head,”

Every thing that is happening in America today was predicted and the response by the Trump Administration is Deliberate. Donald Trump, Jared Kushner and Blackstone are all Real Estate Guys, They know about Evictions and purchasing property at distressed prices at auctions. This is no mistake, This was the expected result of ignoring COVID-19.

Trump Administration Crimson Contagion Exercise of 2019

Protect Yourself, Your loved ones, and all who are forced to work, especially the Healthcare Workers.

Something for Businesses of all sizes to think about, Your employees are under extreme pressure to come to work. Some will come to work with COVID-19 some will know, most won’t that is just a fact.

Leave a comment

Filed under #novaccinenocure, #SanMateoCountyNews, #stayhomesavelives, #WEARAMASK, CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Citizen Journalist, Coronavirus, Crimson Contagion, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019, Dr. Scott Morrow, Michael G. Stogner, No Cure, No Treatment, No Vaccine, Outrageous Government Conduct, PANDEMIC, Public Trust, San Mateo County News, Shelter in Place Order, SMC Contact Tracing, SMC COVID-19 Call Center, Stay in Home Order, Those Who Matter, Victim's Advocate

Dr. Scott Morrow “It’s in Your Hands.”

By Michael G. Stogner

Dr. Scott Morrow

That simple statement is refreshing. It has always been in Your Hands. Nobody likes being told what to do. I’m one of those people, if you tell me not to do something it makes me want to do it, even if I didn’t want to do it in the first place.

I first had to look up the word Pandemic, I didn’t know what it meant, I thought I did but I wanted to check, it turns out I didn’t.

Then add No Symptoms, Airborne, No Cure, No Treatment, No Vaccine,

Then add The Trump Administration conducted the Crimson Contagion Exercise from Jan. though Sept, 2019. Google it.

You are responsible for Your Health and Safety everything you do has risks.

Best of Health, Stay Safe, Wear a Mask

Article It’s up to You, Figure it out.

2 Comments

Filed under #lessthanlivesmatter, #novaccinenocure, #SanMateoCountyNews, #stayhomesavelives, #WEARAMASK, Citizen Journalist, Coronavirus, COVID-19, COVID-19 Testing, Dr. Scott Morrow, Michael G. Stogner, No Cure, No Treatment, No Vaccine, San Mateo County Health, SMC Citizen Advocate Brent Turner, Victim's Advocate

CDC COVID-19 Aerosols for Hours.

By Michael G, Stogner

Here we are Nine months into a PANDEMIC. Remember You are responsible for protecting yourself and loved ones. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention acknowledged Monday that the coronavirus can spread through microscopic respiratory particles known as aerosols that float in the air for minutes or even hours before being inhaled.

WEAR A MASK, STAY SAFE.

Todays LATIMES Article:

CDC warns of aerosol spread

Tiny particles that linger in the air can help transmit virus, especially in crowded indoor spaces.

WEARING masks and social distancing indoors are keys to stopping the virus from being transmitted. (Allen J. Schaben Los Angeles Times) 

By Richard Read

SEATTLE — The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention acknowledged Monday that the coronavirus can spread through microscopic respiratory particles known as aerosols that float in the air for minutes or even hours before being inhaled.

On its website, the CDC said that even people who followed social distancing guidelines have been infected through this type of transmission — and added a warning against frequenting crowded, poorly ventilated indoor spaces.

The acknowledgment comes after months of campaigning by independent experts and brings the agency into line with research on the role of aerosols in “super-spreading events” such as a choir practice in Washington state that infected dozens of people and killed two.

But some researchers said the agency did not go far enough, because it maintains that the virus is still far more likely to spread through larger respiratory droplets that quickly fall on people in close vicinity.

Donald K. Milton, a University of Maryland environmental health professor and expert on aerosols, said Monday that the CDC was “slowly moving along in the right direction, but is not where I would quite like to see it.”

He said that mathematical models show that aerosols carrying the virus are more apt to spread the disease than larger droplets spewed as projectiles, even when an infected person is less than six feet away.

“At close range, you’re still going to see aerosol transmission dominant most of the time,” he said. “Spitballs are much less frequent.”

He said that means that masks — which the CDC has long recommended be worn when near others — are useful both indoors and outdoors for preventing the spread of the virus.

“Outdoor dining is associated with increased risk of getting COVID-19 because people are sitting there for a long time without a mask in one spot,” he said.

Moving around when outdoors lowers the risk of inhaling aerosols and becoming infected, he said.

When the coronavirus began spreading in the United States early this year, the CDC advised people to stay at least six feet away from other people and wash their hands frequently in case they happened to touch contaminated surfaces.

Later the agency said that contaminated surfaces played only a minor role in spreading the virus.

Researchers began following up on reports of super-spreading incidents in which aerosols appeared to be the main culprit.

The scientists urged the CDC and the World Health Organization to acknowledge airborne transmission, but health officials were skeptical.

In July, after 239 researchers from 32 countries signed an open letter urging the WHO to accept the possibility that aerosols played a major role in spreading the virus, the international agency revised its guidelines to recommend that people avoid poorly ventilated, crowded spaces.

Still, the WHO maintains that aerosol transmission has not been definitively demonstrated.

On Sept. 18, the CDC revised its guidance without notice to say that the virus spread through aerosols, but withdrew the new advisory three days later , saying it was a draft of proposed changes posted by mistake.

CDC officials did not respond to requests for an interview Monday.

A letter written by Milton and five other researchers and published Monday by Science magazine cited “overwhelming evidence” that inhalation was “a major transmission route” for the coronavirus and cited an urgent need to define terms consistently across scientific fields.

Respiratory droplets, defined as larger than 100 microns, can be sprayed like tiny cannonballs and typically fall to the ground in seconds within six feet, the letter said.

But the letter said that aerosols — defined as particles smaller than 100 microns, less than the diameter of the average human hair — “can remain suspended in air for many seconds to hours, like smoke.”

Milton said that tobacco smoke is an apt analogy to understand how tiny respiratory particles waft through the air.

“If somebody goes out for a smoke and they come in and you smell it on their breath, you’re inhaling their exhaled breath,” he said.

Milton said while the virus is most apt to spread through the air indoors, where aerosol can accumulate, it’s possible that airborne transmission occurred at the Sept. 26 White House Supreme Court nomination ceremony for Judge Amy Coney Barrett.

The event included a large gathering in the Rose Garden and a smaller, indoor reception. Photographs show that in both locations few people wore masks and that social distancing guidelines were not widely followed.

The CDC has the technical resources to conduct an investigation that could determine who infected whom, Milton said.

“It would be very interesting to know which way the wind was blowing in the Rose Garden,” he said. “They were really close to each other, they were hugging each other, they were shaking hands. They were throwing all precautions to the wind, and the wind got them anyway.”

Leave a comment

Filed under #2americas, #novaccinenocure, #SanMateoCountyNews, CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coronavirus, COVID-19, COVID-19 Testing, No Cure, No Treatment, No Vaccine, San Mateo County News, SMC Citizen Advocate Brent Turner