19-FAM-02812 | Alberto A Bolanos vs. Suzanne Ramos Bolanos
If Hon. Judge Joseph Scotts’ court clerk Katrina Bihl had not name dropped this case on a Open Public Access phone line that was left on instead of being muted as she declared under the penalty of Perjury to the court, I would have not heard about it. I was on that Public Access Phone Line July 27, 2021 for the Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez motion to continue that only lasted a few minutes. San Mateo County District Attorney Inspector Jordan Boyd got a copy of the phone records for that morning, it shows my phone number on that call 2 different times. Inspector Jordan Boyd never called me to ask what did I hear on that open phone line that morning? He has never bothered to ask me anything when we are both in the same courtroom for the Juan P. Lopez Criminal Case? The last time we were in the same courtroom was last Friday in Courtroom 2G 9:00AM.
To the residents of San Mateo County you might remember your District Attorney’s Office Deliberately Filed FALSE charges against San Mateo County Sheriff Deputy Juan Pablo Lopez in 2014. That was close to 8 years ago. They arrested him at gunpoint in front of his son. They held a Press Conference the charges included Smuggling a cell phone and drugs into the Maguire Jail and delivering them to an inmate. Every San Mateo County Employee involved with that investigation knew the Charges were FALSE.
Why was Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez falsely charged? Why is that OK with the 5 Supervisors.
Why is that OK with the 760,000 San Mateo County residents?
Why is that OK with Fixin SMC?
Why is that OK with Sheriff Elect Christina Corpus?
Why is that OK with the 800 Sheriff Employees?
Recently there was an Letter to the Editor titled Judges for Sheriff Bolanos. I laughed when I read that and thought that would be a great name for the Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez criminal case.
As many of you know San Mateo County News.com has been reporting on Deputy Lopez’s case from the very beginning. I have attended almost every single hearing for more than 5 years I have lived in Monterey County so you can do the math on how many hours I have spent in Gridlock and court to bring the NEWS about this Very Important Criminal Case which demonstrates the Organized Crime and Corruption at all levels of San Mateo County Government.
Please join me in Courtroom 2G this Friday to show support to Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez.
Dept25 <dept25@sanmateocourt.org>
To:Michael Stogner
Tue, Jun 21 at 11:49 AM
Good morning,
We will not be using Zoom for the hearing on June 24, 2022.
Thank you,
Katrina Bihl Clerk to the Honorable Joseph C. Scott Department 25 (650) 261-5125 Superior Court of California
County of San Mateo
From: Michael Stogner <michaelgstogner@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 9:24 AM To: Dept25 <dept25@sanmateocourt.org> Subject: June 24, 2022 x San Mateo County Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez case ZOOM?
Good morning,
I’m just checking to see if Hon. Judge Joseph Scott will be allowing this case hearing to be viewed by the public by ZOOM this Friday?
People of the State of California v. Juan Pablo Lopez NF433910
Thank You
Michael G. Stogner
San Mateo County News.com
I think everyone knows by now that Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos lost the election this month. I was surprised that he ran at all. For those of you who didn’t know Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos has been on the Witness list in the Juan P. Lopez case for almost 8 years, He has been protected by the County Counsel Attorneys all this this. Come January he is Retiring and it will be interesting to see if the Taxpayers continue to provide free legal services to him.
Enforcing the Law Equally has Never been a Strong Suit for D.A. Steve Wagstaffe or Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos. Don’t forget San Mateo Residents were all notified with the April 25, 2007 E-mails.
The San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office Jumped into action and got the Phone records of the Superior Courtroom 2G for the date of July 27, 2021. That phone number was 650-261-5125
This is an accurate copy of that data. only change is I XXX out the last phone call.
As you can see the 650-261-5125 was opened at 9:14:03 and Closed at 10:43:64 AM
6502615125 MENLO PARK, CA Unspecified 7/27/2021 9:14:03 AM ‘ 7/27/2021 10:43:64 AM Host Anonymous Unspecified 7/27/2021 9:20:20 AM 7/27/2021 9:20:41 AM Attendee Anonymous Unspecified 7/27/2021 9:23:51 AM 7/27/2021 9:33:34 AM Attendee Anonymous Unspecified 7/27/2021 9:26:46 AM 7/27/2021 9:37:20 AM Attendee 8312108994 MONTEREY CA Unspecified 7/27/2021-9:33:05 AM 7/27/2021 9:42:49 AM Attendee Anonymous Unspecified 7Q7/2021 9:33:53 AM 7/27/2021 10:13:26 AM Attendee 8312108994 MONTEREY CA Unspecified 7/27/2021 9:54:05 AM 7/27/2021 9:56:10 AM Attendee XXXXXXXXX BURLINGAME CA Unspecified 7/27/2021 10:05:39 AM 7/27/2021 10:13:1? AM Attendee
My phone number is 831-210-8994
On August 27, 2021 Katrina Bihl, Courtroom Clerk for the Honorable Joseph C. Scott, Judge for the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo (Judge Scott), through her Attorney Sarah L. Overton (CSB # 163810) filed a DECLARATION OF KRINTINABIHL IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO THE CHALLENGE FOR CAUSE. Case # NF433910-A
On page 2 Line 13 Katrina Bihl Declares under the Penalty of Perjury the following: After the hearing, as was my usual practice, I muted the public access line and proceeded to work at my desk in the courtroom while I waited to see if the master calendar court would send any matters to this courtroom.
That statement is simply false.
SMCDA Inspector Jordon Boyd could have simply called me. He Never did.
The filing of this declaration with the court is a PC115(a) a Felony.
San Mateo County District Attorney Office Inspector Jordan Boyd knows that is a False Statement. So does DDA Kimberly Perrotti and yet they continue to march on to cause as much pain and suffering on a San Mateo County Sheriff Deputy now retired.
Juan P. Lopez
Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez’s Next Court Date: April 7, 2022 9:00 AM
“Thrown Out” is not a legal term and I would not have used it, if DDA Kimberly Perrotti had not said it in court.
Yesterday was a first for me in 22 years observing and reporting of SMC Courts. San Mateo County District Attorney Deputy Kimberly Perrotti informed the court that she had personally contacted the Santa Clara County District Attorney’s prosecutor who was trying a case that Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez’s Co-Counsel Erica Elizabeth Treeby was the defense attorney in. She reported to Judge Scott that Ms. Treeby would be available on March 17, 2022 in SMC, because of this alleged conversation. She did not identify this person, and this person has not been called to testify about this alleged conversation and there was no declaration filed.
I think it would be great for the public to know about that entire conversation from start to finish.
I would like to know how many times DDA Kimberly Perrotti has checked up on the Defense Attorneys opposing her?
Remember this is a Political Prosecution of Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez it’s that simple. Photo below is from 2014. You do the math for lost wages and cost to Defend against these False Charges, that were “THROWN OUT”
How many of you think Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez is guilty of this Smuggling Case?
03/08/2022 Continued Jury Trial Judicial Officer Scott, Joseph C. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
Comment Motions
03/08/2022 Continued Jury Trial Original Type Continued Jury Trial Judicial Officer Scott, Joseph C. Hearing Time 09:30 AM Result Held Comment Motions Parties Present Defendant: LOPEZ, JUAN PABLO Attorney: SERRA, J. TONY
03/08/2022 Party appeared by audio and/or video
03/08/2022 Motion denied. Comment Moving party: People’s Motion title: Additional Motion in Limine #10 – Exclude reference to dismiss counts and charges
03/08/2022 Motion denied Comment WITHOUT PREJUDICE Moving party: People’s Motion title: Additional Motion in Limine #11 – Based on the court’s ruling on motion #10 above, refer to the remaining counts submitted to the jury as “first count”, “second count” etc. rather than “count 1”, “count 3”, etc.
03/17/2022 Continued Jury Trial Judicial Officer Scott, Joseph C. Hearing Time 09:30 AM Comment Motion to Continue Trial
03/21/2022 Continued Jury Trial Judicial Officer Scott, Joseph C. Hearing Time 09:00 AM Comment Jury Selections
This was changed after SMCN.com article was published. This is just one example of the Odyssey Official Records are only as good as the entry from the Court Clerk.
03/08/2022 Minutes corrected as follows: Comment Modification: MIL #10 GRANTED By: K. Bihl Today’s Date: 3/9/2022
Former San Mateo County Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez is in court today January 12, 2022 at 9:30 A.M. in Courtroom 2G. The Judge hearing the Motion is Hon. Judge Joseph Scott.
You will recall that Defense Attorney Tony Serra respectfully asked Judge Scott to recuse himself for Bias. He hired a law firm in Riverside and declined.
San Mateo County Counsel Attorney Joseph Charles is representing SMC District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe who has been doing everything possible to not have to Testify under–oath in this case.
The six charges that are in court today over 7 years after District Attorney Steve Wafstaffe gave a News Press Release in front of Television crew to announce that Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez was Arrested and Charged with Smuggling a Cellphone and Drugs into the Maguire Jail and gave them to a Hells Angel Gang Member. That NEVER Happened.
On that day standing in front of those News cameras, District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe, William Massey, John Warren, Jordan Boyd, Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos, Sgt. Jason Peardon, Lt. Andrew Armando, San Mateo County Counsel all knew or should have known those charges were 100% FALSE.
Now today in court the remaining 6 charges and the ONLY charges that DDA Kimberly Perrotti want the jury to hear or know about is Mortgage, Insurance and Election Fraud.
Did Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez vote from Both of his residences? Nope only Redwood City, where his car was broken into. That is where Jordan Boyd knew he lived.
Remember in 2014 Sheriff Deputy Juan Pablo Lopez reported to the San Mateo County Sheriff Office that his car was broken into in the garage area of his Redwood City Condo. When he was asked by the Deputy who took the report, do you have any idea who might have done this?
Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez responded, “The San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office Gang Task Force.”
Has the SMCDA’s Office ever asked the Gang Task Force to break into cars? Ask Jamie Draper.
Documents stolen in Car Break-in included Mortgage and Insurance issues. “BACKPACK”
I am 100% in favor of the San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office and the Sheriff’s Office making sure that their employees are honest. That they would NEVER file a False Police Report, or Affidavit for a Search Warrant, or check the owner occupied box on a Mortgage Refinance Application, or spend the Insurance settlement Check received for damage in the Kitchen on something else. You want to make sure you employees are the right Moral Character like the 45 mentioned in the Gross Misconduct in the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office Document.
Has SMCDA Inspector Jordan Boyd started his own investigation of any of the 45 men named. There is a pretty good chance he would find some Mortgage and Insurance Fraud cases in that group.
2010 Female San Mateo County Sheriff Deputy Whistleblower on Gross Misconduct.
Zain Jaffer on July 2, 2019 in a San Mateo County Courtroom you stated that You wanted to help others who were innocent. I have recommended the Juan P. Lopez case to you several times since that day. I hope you meant what you said.
UPDATED DECEMBER 30, 2021 COVID-Related Rescheduling of Hearings Temporary Courtroom Closure 1/3/2022 through 1/14/2022: Please click here for more information. CIVIL EX PARTES: Pursuant to Emergency Local Rule 3-101, effective January 1, 2022, all ex partes in civil law and motion matters are temporarily suspended until further order of the Court. Please click here for Civil Division information: http://www.sanmateocourt.org/court_divisions/civil/. CRIMINAL: All Preliminary Hearings currently scheduled between 1/3/2022 and 1/14/2022 will be heard at the Southern Courthouse at 400 County Center in Redwood City. If your Preliminary Hearing is scheduled for the Northern Courthouse in South San Francisco, you should appear on the same scheduled date and time at 400 County Center in Redwood City, not South San Francisco. Please click here for Criminal Division information: http://www.sanmateocourt.org/court_divisions/criminal/. SMALL CLAIMS: All small claims hearings currently scheduled at 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM between 1/3/2022 and 1/14/2022 will be rescheduled to a later date. A notice of new hearing dates will be mailed to impacted parties. Please click here for Small Claims Division information: http://www.sanmateocourt.org/court_divisions/small_claims/.TRAFFIC: All traffic arraignment and court trial hearings currently scheduled between 1/3/2022 and 1/14/2022 will be rescheduled to a later date. Customers will receive their new date in the mail, sent to the address on the citation. Please click here for Traffic Division information: http://www.sanmateocourt.org/court_divisions/traffic
UPDATED NOVEMBER 22, 2021 Public Access Policy Updated 11/22/21 – The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect; proceedings are open to the public to attend in person.
San Mateo County Superior Court is committed to continuing public access to court proceedings during and after the pandemic emergency. Due to COVID-19 and public health concerns, the Court has shifted to convene some court proceedings remotely in order to eliminate the need for individuals to attend hearings in person. This is to reduce the number of visits by the public to the courthouses, thereby minimizing potential infection of the public and staff.
At this time, members of the public may attend a court proceeding in person. The Court is committed to maintaining a safe workplace for our staff and the public. Each courtroom can accommodate a different number of seats in the audience. You will need to check-in with the bailiff when you enter the courtroom. The bailiff will inform you as to whether or not there is an available seat, or if capacity has been reached. If capacity has been reached, you may remain outside the courtroom until someone leaves. Face coverings are required at all times inside the courthouse.
Zoom may not be used for public access without the approval of the judicial officer.
Wonderful photo by SMDJ of Aldon Smith, Definitely NOT a Booking Photo.Sheriff Carlos G. BolanosD.A. Stephen M. Wagstaffe
This is a “Those who Matter” case, San Mateo County Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos provided NO BOOKING PHOTO or PRESS/NEWS RELEASE of the arrest. Why?
That is the first Tell. The 2nd Tell is Defense Attorney Josh Bentley, The 3rd Tell District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe filed this case as a Misdemeanor 21-SM instead of a 21-SF which is a FELONY.
Smith declined a field sobriety test but later took a blood test that showed a blood-alcohol content of .288 percent, District Attorney Stephen Wagstaffe confirmed Thursday. Smith spent the night in jail. (source San Jose Mercury News Michael Nowels)
By declining a sobriety test at the scene, you forfeit California Drivers License for 1 year, unless you are one of the “Those Who Matter” TEAM.
If he was a BAC of .288 why is he charged with a 0.08?
San Mateo County has a First Chance DUI program for 1st time offenders. To my knowledge it does not have a 4th or 5th Chance DUI Program.
San Mateo County does have Defense Attorney Josh Bentley, Watch this case, it is going to be exciting.
TMZ was the first to report the arrest on December 6, 2021.
When I say watch this case, I mean show up to Court IN PERSON. A reasonable thinking person would know that there is a COVID-19 Pandemic in San Mateo County at this time. Listening by phone to the Court Hearings would be a lot safer you would think. Superior Court of California County of San Mateo Presiding Judge Leland Davis III thinks just the opposite. He cancelled Public Access by Telephone on November 22, 2021.
If you do attend the next Court date don’t be surprised if Aldon Smith and Josh Bentley appear remotely for safety reasons. Who would blame them. Stay Safe
Making San Mateo County Safer and Eliminating Corruption has been a project of mine for over 20 years now. I support the Public and Community in the Recall of the Daly City Elected Officials. It is exactly what Jeff Regan recommended shortly after Roger Allen R.I.P. was killed by the Daly City Police Officers who claimed all 4 of them were surrounding the disabled truck with a Flat Tire because “They were there to Help.”
Bay Area Transparency Video made 1 year ago tomorrow, Roger Allen R.I.P. was killed April 7, 2021, 96 days after this video was made. Now I got to see the “We are here to help.” in action. Roger Allen R.I.P. also saw it.
A while ago, We personally reached out to Talika, Roger Allen’s Sister, to express our sorrow and outrage for his murder. And also to offer love and support for Her, Her Family and the Community. We remain steadfast on the resignations of ALL Daly City Council Members and the disposal of the City Manager and Assistant City Manager. They are truly trash! We have been active in sending very pointed and directed email messages and verbal comments to all Council Members as well as the City Manager demanding their departures. We have called dc officials out as racists, murderous cowards. We have verbally vanquished them to Hell. Dropping a few f bombs on them on the way. We verbally broke the DCPD chief and captain in prior meetings as well as moderator leilani ramos and most recently demolishing council member buenaventura. We have reminded them, all Meetings are their LEGACY for their current and future generations to view them as the trash they are. This is pure demonic cowardice evil. We would like to connect with Community Leaders and Community Organizations in an effort to begin a RECALL effort in early 2022. We think it would be best to connect as a Whole Community. Strength in Numbers!! We would be more than happy to support all efforts to begin:“Recall the Racist, Murderous DC Council Members.” More than happy to put the banners together. Please let us know if ALL of us can come together on this. We can connect in early 2022 after the Holidays and as DC City Council Meeting has been moved to Jan 10th, 2022 another display of their cowardice. Finally, it really hit us hard as many of us, if not all, have our Family with us this Holiday Season and Talika and Ms. Wright do not have Roger with them
Please let us know your thoughts of change for a better, safer Daly City in 2022. Best Regards. The Public and Community
Most residents in San Mateo County don’t know that the behavior of the Police Department is the responsibility of the City Manager. The voters of Daly City can not recall the City Manager, The City Council can Fire/Terminate her if they wish too, they don’t. So the only option is to RECALL the Councilmembers.
You may remember the Residents of Foster City, San Mateo County, California recently Successfully RECALLED Herb Perez the vice mayor. You can just imagine how many Political Experts thought that was terrible Idea.
There are many families in San Mateo County who have lost loved ones to Homicide by Law Enforcement. Please keep them in your thoughts.
If you are interested in joining The Public and Community in this effort you can send me your contact information at michaelgstogner@yahoo.com and I will pass it on.
Today December 22, 2021 Courtroom 8B at 9:00AM Hon. Judge Chinhayi C. Cadet for Arraignment
SMCCCD Vice Chancellor Jose D. Nunez has been charged with 15 Felony counts, including Embezzlement and PERJURY. He has not been arrested yet. Why? also PER DA AND DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY’S REQUEST. NTA MAY NOT REACH DEFENDANT IN TIME. NTA= Notice to appear, Mr. Nunez might not even know he has been invited to show up in court today. Very casual for a 2.5 year Criminal Investigation. How much did the 2.5 year Investigation cost SMC Taxpayer? Lets compare that to the final outcome of this case, which will most likely never get to a Jury Trial.
Just because a person is criminally charged with a crime in San Mateo County doesn’t mean that he or she is guilty. Look no further than Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez case NF433910A or the Sheriff Activities League (SAL) Embezzlement and Money Laundering case.
The Public is invited to attend in person by Hon. Judge Leland Davis III. Up until November 22, 2021 the public which includes reporters were able to Listen to the Hearing by calling this number 503-300-6847 Code 438807. Remember there is a Pandemic in the world including San Mateo County.
Public Access Policy Updated 11/22/21 – The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect; proceedings are open to the public to attend in person.
I have recommended a Single Point Data Base to San Mateo County Government (SUPERVISORS) for 20 years. Just think how much time and money it would have saved if it caught the alleged Felony on 3/4/2009. Also it would be helpful if the District Attorney’s Office charge all people equally, for example if a Judge, a court clerk, and a court reporter committed a Felony, it would go a long way for Public Trust if they were arrested, charged, and prosecuted. Here are the current charges in the Nunez case.
From today’s hearing:
Disposition Events
12/22/2021Plea
Judicial Officer Cadet, Chinhayi C.
001
PC424(a)-FEL-Public Officer Crime
Not Guilty
001
PC803(c)-ENH-Special Allegation-Statute Of Limitations-Late Discovery (Zamora Allegation)
Not Guilty
002
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
003
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
004
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
005
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
006
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
007
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
008
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
009
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
010
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
011
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
012
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
013
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
013
PC803(c)-ENH-Special Allegation-Statute Of Limitations-Late Discovery (Zamora Allegation)
Not Guilty
014
EC7054-FEL- Use of School District or College District Funds for Political Purposes
Not Guilty
014
PC803(c)-ENH-Special Allegation-Statute Of Limitations-Late Discovery (Zamora Allegation)
Not Guilty
015
EC7054-FEL- Use of School District or College District Funds for Political Purposes
Not Guilty
Events and Hearings
12/16/2021 Efiling – Initial
12/16/2021 New Filed Case
12/16/2021 Notice to Appear sent to defendant
12/22/2021 Arraignment
Original TypeArraignmentJudicial OfficerCadet, Chinhayi C.Hearing Time9:00 AMResultArraignedCommentPER DA AND DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY’S REQUEST. NTA MAY NOT REACH DEFENDANT IN TIME.
Parties Present
Defendant: Nunez, Jose DAttorney: AGRE, LYN R
12/22/2021 Advisement of Rights
12/22/2021 Arraignment waived on complaint
12/22/2021 Time waiver for preliminary hearing.
Comment Defendant personally waived time for 10 court days and 60 calendar days for the preliminary hearing.
12/22/2021 Defendant ordered to return.
01/05/2022 Superior Court Review
Judicial Officer(s) Greenberg, Susan, Southern Superior Court Review, –Hearing Time1:30 PMComment and To Set Prelim
This case was Very Fast from start to finish, How and Why?
Just because somebody says something is true, doesn’t mean that it is.
As it turns out a San Mateo County Resident was arrested and Criminally Charged with three Felony Sexual Assault counts Bail was $500,000 and 47 days later his case is complete all the Sexual Assault charges are dismissed. This would be a good case for an AUDIT to simply find out what really happened. Was a man falsely charged in the first place? There is No Comment from Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos about his Sheriff Investigators and their work on this case. What are their thoughts?
Sean Gallagher and Steve Wagstaffe offered Mr. Banister to reduce this case to 1 count a Misdemeanor, Why? and Why so fast?
San Mateo County Sheriff Office arrested Mr. Banister on August 31, 2021 after Investigating the Sexual Assault allegations. The Investigation started on August 2, 2021, A Judge issued a $500,000 Warrant for his arrest based on the SMCSO work product.
San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office filed the charges below on November 1, 2021, that’s 2 months after his arrest. So the District Attorney’s Office had two months to review the SMCSO Investigators work and they confirmed the three Felony sexual assault charges on an 11 year old victim.
On November 30, 2021 this offer was read in court, that is 29 days after the charges were approved and filed, What changed? What Happened?
I was not able to report what the District Attorney’s Offer was on November 30, 2021 because I was not sitting in the Courtroom. Also not in the Courtroom that morning was defendant Michael D. Banister and his defense attorney Joseph Goethals. They appeared by zoom or phone.
Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo Presiding Judge Leland Davis III cancelled the Public Access by Telephone on November 22, 2021. He has never explained Why? It can’t be because it’s safe to attend court in person now, So it must be some other really Important reason.
“The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect; proceedings are open to the public to attend in person.“
The San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office has a Victim’s Advocate. Did the Victim’s Advocate meet with the child and did he/she agree with this offer?
Did the parents of the victim agree with the offer?
Does anybody wonder why Sexual Assault Victims don’t want to report the crimes.
Does San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office ever charge somebody with crimes they know they did not commit? Of course they do, look no further than People vs. Juan Pablo Lopez case NF433910A
Is that what happened is this case? I don’t know. Somebody reported a crime, the Sheriff’s Office Investigated and so did the District Attorney’s Office. They called the 11 year old girl a Victim.
How is it possible for these charges to be DISMISSED?
Remember a person is innocent until proven Guilty.
San Mateo County News 