Category Archives: Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019

What does Dr. Scott Morrow say? County Manager Mike Callagy says “COVID is out there.”

By Michael G. Stogner

How many Children under the age of FIVE live in San Mateo County?

From Today’s San Mateo Daily Journal Article Hospitalizations Spiking in SMC.

“We’re not shutting down, society is not shutting down but COVID is out there.”

“I don’t want people to be alarmed. We can take care of those we need to take care of right now,” County Manager Mike Callagy said.

“So far, we’ve been able to manage. I expect we’ll be able to manage through this and we hope the peak is on the horizon here,” Callagy said,

This sounds like Rosanne Faust back in March of 2020.

‘Just facts on virus, not fear’: SAMCEDA aims to educate – San …

https://www.smdailyjournal.com › coronavirus › just-facts…Mar 13, 2020 — Facts about the coronavirus, not fear, is the goal of San Mateo County Economic Development Association, executive Rosanne Foust says.

This was Predictable it’s going to get worse.

Google Search the Crimson Contagion Functional Exercise 2019

What does Dr. Scott Morrow say?

Leave a comment

Filed under #SanMateoCountyNews.com, #WEARAMASK, Associated Press, Bay Area News Group, Bay Cities News Foundation, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019, Crimson Contagion Functional Exercise 2019, Dr. Scott Morrow, https://missionlocal.org, Life is great here in San Mateo County, Local Media Consortium, Los Angeles Times., Making San Mateo County Safer, Michael G. Stogner, New Media Investment Group, Newsbreakapp.com, newsbreezer.com, Rosanne Faust, San Mateo County Health, San Mateo County Manager Mike Callagy, SiliconValley.com

San Mateo County, Protect the Children, It’s in the Air.

By Michael G. Stogner

Children under 5 can not be vaccinated yet. What are you going to do to PROTECT THEM?

Children ages 4 and younger hospitalized with COVID-19 increased by 791% in the last month.

335% for kids ages 5 to 11

1,047% for 12- to 18-year-olds in the same time period.

Source

Children under 5 can not be vaccinated yet. COVID-19 particles are an airborne virus. You can’t see it or smell it.

Now think about smelling cigarette/cigar/BBQ you might not see the smoke in the air but you can smell it. That is how COVID-19 can infect people.

I recommend you read the Crimson Contagion Functional Exercise of 2019. What is happening today was Predictable.

Stay safe and protect the Children.

Leave a comment

Filed under "Threat to Childrens Health and Safety, #newsbreak, #SanMateoCountyNews.com, #WEARAMASK, Apnews.com, Associated Press, Bay Cities News Foundation, Bing, Blackstone, bloomberg.com, BUSINESS WIRE, businessinsider, CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Citizen Journalist, COVID-19, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019, East Bay Times, ELENI BALAKRISHNAN Reporter, It's Serve & Protect NOT Serve & Infect, Los Angeles Times., Making San Mateo County Safer, medium.com, Michael G. Stogner, Mike Callagy, muckrack.com, New Media Investment Group, Newsbreakapp.com, newsbreezer.com, Newsweek, prnewsonline.com, Protect Everyone, Protect the Children, Protect the Residents of California, Quality of Life for San Mateo County, San Mateo County First Five, San Mateo County News.com, San Mateo County SFO International Airport, U.S. News and World Report., USA Today, Victim's Advocate

Judge Leland Davis III, Court Excetuive Officer Neil Taniguchi, might want to get on same page with Sheriff Bolanos.

By Michael G. Stogner

Judge Davis III and Neil Taniguchi came up with the bright idea to cancel the Public Telephone access to the Courts in the middle of a raging Pandemic.

Public Access Policy
Updated 11/22/21 – The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect; proceedings are open to the public to attend in person.

At this time, members of the public may attend a court proceeding in person.

At the very same time the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office issued this a few hours ago. This Jail is connected to the Courthouse that the public is invited to attend in PERSON.

NEWS RELEASE

Incident Date and Time: 01/06/2022
Location: San Mateo County Correctional Facilities Type of Crime/Incident: Covid 19/Omicron Update

Summary:

The following procedures have been implemented by the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office and San Mateo County Correctional Health Services at our correctional facilities to protect our employees and incarcerated people from Covid-19/Omicron.

o All in-person visiting is canceled until further notice. Exception: Attorney visits and court-ordered visits.

o All staff is required to wear N-95 or KN-95 masks inside all correctional facilities.
o All incarcerated people are required to wear their masks when outside their cell.
o All incarcerated people going to court are required to wear an N-95 or KN-95 mask.
o All in-person programs have been canceled until further notice.
o No in-person meetings or large gatherings (except emergencies).
o Newly arrived incarcerated people will be quarantined per CDC guidelines. This will be

to ensure none of the incarcerated people have developed symptoms of Covid-19.
o In the event an incarcerated person shows signs of Covid-19, the Correctional Staff will

collaborate with Correctional Health Services to implement a quarantine plan for that

housing area as deemed necessary.
o If you have the following symptoms, please refrain from entering the correctional

lobbies. Fever, cough, difficulty breathing, and shortness of breath and please contact

your medical provider.
o The San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office will continue to collaborate with the San Mateo

County Correctional Health Services to ensure our employees and the incarcerated

people are provided the most up-to-date information and protection from Covid-19. o Incarcerated people will attend video court inside their housing units except for those

who are required to attend in person.
o All correctional staff are required to take COVID tests once per week. All arrestees will

be screened outside of the facility. This will consist of a pre-booking questionnaire and

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER • DETECTIVE JAVIER ACOSTA • 650-363-4800 • PIO@SMCGOV.ORG 400 COUNTY CENTER • REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063 • 650-421-1243 • https://www.smcsheriff.com

an intensive medical screening. If an arrestee is displaying symptoms of Covid-19 and is medically cleared, they will be isolated.

Thank you for your patience and understanding during this challenging time.

Written by: Detective Javier Acosta Release Date: 01/06/2022

1 Comment

Filed under #newsbreak, #SanMateoCountyNews.com, CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Citizen Journalist, Coronavirus, Court Executive Officer Neal I Taniguchi, Court Executive Officer: Neal I. Taniguchi, COVID-19, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019, David Khan of Daly City, PANDEMIC, San Mateo County Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos, SMCSO Detective Javier Acosta, Superior Court of California San Mateo County Assistant Presiding Judge Elizabeth K. Lee, Superior Court of California San Mateo County Presiding Judge Leland Davis III

Family Court Judges, Rule on Unvaccinated Parents and Children. “This child needs to be protected.”

By Michael G. Stogner

Everybody and their mother knew this day was coming, as if Family Law Courts were not expensive enough as they are. But this is an issue that the parents are bringing on themselves. Judges around the Country are making rulings to protect the Children when one of the Parents chooses not too. Also now being Vaccinated is part of the Custody equation. If a parent refuses to get vaccinated or refuses to get his/her children vaccinated it could/will impact the outcome of which parent gets custody.

Today LATIMES Article

Family courts weigh in on vaccinations
What happens when one divorced parent hasn’t gotten the shot? Judges take up issue.
By Emily Alpert Reyes
Flanked by their lawyers, the divorced parents hashed out an agreement outside the Pasadena courtroom and returned to inform the judge: They had agreed their young son would get the COVID-19 vaccine.
“Absolutely he needs to be vaccinated,” Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Harvey A. Silberman said.
Then he asked the parents: “Are the two of you vaccinated?”
The mother said yes. The father said no. “Sir, you better get vaccinated,” the judge said, according to a court transcript. “Or you could very well lose time with your child unless you have a medical reason not to.”
As children and teens have become eligible for COVID-19 shots, divorced parents have clashed in court over whether to get kids vaccinated. In some cases — including the one now before a judge in Los Angeles County — family courts have also started to weigh in on parents being vaccinated against the coronavirus.
In Illinois, a judge made headlines after ruling that a mother could not see her 11-year-old son until she had gotten vaccinated, a decision that was later rescinded.
In New York, a father was suspended from visits unless he got vaccinated or underwent regular testing. “The danger of voluntarily remaining unvaccinated during access with a child while the COVID-19 virus remains a threat to children’s health and safety cannot be understated,” Judge Matthew F. Cooper wrote.
Attorney Lloyd C. Rosen, who represents the New York father, said his client is getting tested regularly in order to keep seeing his daughter but has filed a notice to preserve his right to appeal the ruling.
Rosen argued that the court had overstepped. Vaccinations and other medical decisions often come up in custody cases, since “it’s not uncommon for parents to disagree regarding medical care or treatment for a child,” he said.
“Here the court is not stepping in and making a decision for the child that the parents can’t make,” Rosen said.
“The court here is stepping in and making a decision for a parent regarding themselves — as a condition to their parental rights.”
Cooper, the judge in that case, wrote that the question was not whether he could require an adult to be vaccinated, which “would stretch the authority of a matrimonial court to unprecedented lengths,” but whether the mother could make vaccination or testing a condition of the father visiting the child.
At the L.A. County hearing, the divorced father said he had medical reasons for not being vaccinated, but Silberman seemed skeptical. In a court order, he directed the father to either provide a medical exemption from his doctor or show that he had gotten vaccinated against COVID-19.
If the father genuinely has a health reason for not getting vaccinated, “I want to know what the medical evidence is,” Silberman said during the hearing. “This child needs to be protected.”
The move surprised attorney Patrick Baghdaserians, who represents the mother. Although Baghdaserians said he is aware of judges supporting COVID-19 shots for children when the issue has arisen in custody cases, “I’ve never seen a judge take the next step, which is … if one of the parents is not vaccinated, that potentially exposes the child to harm.”
Baghdaserians praised the judge and said that if the order were ignored, his client would seek to change the custody arrangement. The mother is supportive of COVID-19 vaccination, he said.
Attorney Alphonse Provinziano, who represents the father, said his client had asked him not to comment on his specific case. He said that in general, California family courts have wide latitude to seek information from parents, but he was unaware of any legal authority for them to change custody based on vaccination status.
Provinziano said it’s possible that someone could try to make such a case by arguing that, “ ‘Well, I don’t think it’s in the best interests of the child’ ” for a parent to not be vaccinated. But “that, I think, would end up going to the Supreme Court of California. … It would be a heavily litigated case.”
Provinziano also argued that, in general, if a parent has a medical reason to not be vaccinated, “you can’t use that disability to say that you’re somehow unable to be a parent to your child.” He pointed to a California ruling that found courts cannot use a physical disability as evidence of whether someone is a fit parent.
The Times is not naming the parents involved in the court case in order to protect the privacy of their child.
In response to questions sent for the judge, a Los Angeles County Superior Court spokeswoman said Silberman was prohibited under ethics canons from making any public comments on a pending case.
Rachel Rebouché, interim dean at Temple University Beasley School of Law, said most state statutes that govern child custody are very broad, centering on “the best interests of the child.”
For instance, courts have been able to restrict visitation rights if a parent lives with a partner who is deemed unsafe for the child, Rebouché said.
In California, courts scrutinize the ability of parents to care for the child, she said, so “whether or not the parent will seek to protect the child from COVID is relevant to the court.”
Still, Rebouché said the L.A. County case and others raise questions about “where are the lines that you draw for what courts can permissibly require parents to do with threat of a custody loss.”
If some people see not getting vaccinated as an issue of religious freedom, “is losing time with a child a denial of that right? Or is it something else?” she asked.
John F. Banzhaf III, professor emeritus of public interest law at George Washington University Law School, argued that there is a strong precedent for courts’ limiting visitation for unvaccinated parents: child custody cases involving cigarette smokers. Family courts have ordered parents who smoke to stop doing so in their homes for 24 or 48 hours before a child visits, Banzhaf said.
In some cases, judges have denied custody to a parent because “the very fact that you would continue smoking around the child, knowing the risk, knowing how widely publicized the risks are, suggests to me a lack of concern” for their health, Banzhaf said.
The legal debate revolves around the protective effects of the vaccines not just for the recipient, but for children and teens around them. Vaccinated people can spread the virus, but health officials have stressed they are much less likely to get infected in the first place, reducing the likelihood they will pass it along.
Rosen, the attorney representing the New York father, argued that even if the father got vaccinated, that would not eliminate the possibility of him getting and transmitting the coronavirus. He also noted that the child goes to day care with other children.
“There’s just so many different ways this child could be exposed to COVID that to single out the father and make his access conditional upon his vaccination status is not only inappropriate, but well beyond any kind of reasonable determination in the best interests of the child,” Rosen said.
Banzhaf argued there was strong evidence for the risks posed to a child by spending time inside with an unvaccinated parent. In fact, he said, “the evidence is far clearer than we used to have with regard to secondhand tobacco smoke” in custody cases.
What will happen for the father in the L.A. County court case remains to be seen. Silberman gave the man roughly a month to provide the documents he requested, which he would review privately.
At the November hearing, Silberman told the father, “I hope you do have a genuine health reason for preventing you from getting” the vaccine. “I just want to know what that is.”

This was totally Predictable, I recommend every person read the Crimson Contagion Functional Exercise of 2019. I did in March 2020.

Best of Health to everyone.

Leave a comment

Filed under "Danger of remaining unvaccinated", "Threat to Childrens Health and Safety, #newsbreak, #SanMateoCountyNews.com, #writingcommunity, Associated Press, “Absolutely he needs to be vaccinated,”, “Are the two of you vaccinated?”, “Sir, you better get vaccinated,”, “The court here is stepping in and making a decision for a parent regarding themselves — as a condition to their parental rights.”, California Judicial Branch News Service, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, Citizen Journalist, Coronavirus, COVID-19, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019, Google, John Myers LATIMES, Judge Matthew F. Cooper, LATIMES Reporter Emily Alpert Reyes, Local Media Consortium, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Harvey A. Silberman, Making San Mateo County Safer, Michael G. Stogner, Newsbreakapp.com, Particle Media Inc, prnewsonline.com, Protect the Children, Protect the Residents of California

San Mateo County has 2 Staffed and Available ICU Beds.

By Michael G. Stogner

That seems like plenty for 760,000 Residents doesn’t it. That data is for December 28, 2021.

San Mateo County Health Website

Leave a comment

Filed under #fostercitynews, #SanMateoCountyNews.com, Apnews.com, Board of Supervisor's President David Canepa, CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019, Dr. Scott Morrow, Newsbreakapp.com, San Mateo County Health

Hon. Judge Leland Davis III, Response is due today.

By Michael G. Stogner

Public Access Policy Updated 11/22/21 – The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect; proceedings are open to the public to attend in person.

Just received this response:

Bianca Fasuescu <bfasuescu@sanmateocourt.org>To:michaelgstogner@yahoo.comThu, Dec 16 at 9:59 AM

Dear Mr. Stogner,

The court received the (attached) request, which you submitted pursuant to rule 10.500 of the California Rules of Court, on Tuesday, December 7, 2021.

The court has concluded that processing this request will require additional time and, therefore, is invoking the 14-day extension permitted under rule 10.500. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 10.500(e)(8)(A)–(C).) We estimate we will be able to notify you whether the court has disclosable responsive records by  Monday, January 10, 2022.

Sincerely,

Bianca Fasuescu

My records show the document was received on December 6, 2021 at 8:03AM

Leave a comment

Filed under #closeSMCcourtsuntilfixed, #corruptionmatters, #EqualJusticeMatters, #SanMateoCountyNews.com, #SMCJUSTICE, #WEARAMASK, Ali Winston Investigative Reporter, Attorney Erica Elizabeth Treeby, Attorney General Rob Bonta, Attorney J. Tony Serra, “You don’t want to be investigating your own agency.", Biden-Harris Adminstration, California Judicial Branch News Service, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, Citizen Journalist, Court Clerk Katrina Bihl, Court Executive Officer Neal I Taniguchi, Court Reporter Jocelyne Fakouri, COVID-19, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019, Hon. Judge Elizabeth K. Lee, Hon. Judge Joseph Scott, Just because somebody says something is True doesn't mean that it is., Making San Mateo County Safer, Maria Belyi, People vs. Juan Pablo Lopez case NF433910A, Superior Court of California San Mateo County Presiding Judge Leland Davis III, The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect

First USA Omicron case has been confirmed in San Francisco.

By Michael G. Stogner

The person was fully vaccinated flew into California from South Africa on November 22, 2021.

San Francisco International is located in San Mateo County.

Vaccine and Booster shots are recommended.

Leave a comment

Filed under #SanMateoCountyNews, #SanMateoCountyNews.com, #stayhomesavelives, #WEARAMASK, CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Citizen Journalist, COVID-19, COVID-19 Testing, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019, San Francisco International Airport

Louise F. Rogers, How many San Mateo County Sheriff Employees are Vaccinated?

By Michael G. Stogner

San Mateo County just had to Reset. That was to be expected.

San Mateo County News.com has asked Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos several times, he has refused to answer.

There is no information on the County’s website that includes San Mateo County Sheriff Office Employees or for that matter all Law Enforcement Departments throughout San Mateo County.

From San Mateo County Health Website

Vaccination update
We continue to stress that COVID-19 vaccination is the most important action to protect oneself, one’s loved ones and the community,

All Together Better,
Louise F. Rogers

San Mateo County News Article asking Sheriff Bolanos for his policy

Leave a comment

Filed under All Together Better, Board of Supervisor's President David Canepa, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019, Louise F. Rogers SMC Health, Michael G. Stogner, San Mateo County News.com, San Mateo County Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos

San Mateo County Wear Masks Indoors.

By Michael G. Stogner

You had to know this was coming, Chamber of Commerce is the last group of people to listen to when it involves your personal HEALTH. If you haven’t read the Crimson Contagion Functional Exercise of 2019 I recommend that you do. I read it in March of 2020 and made my own mind up on how to protect myself this last 16 months. I’m glad I did.

Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019

Something for the young and unvaccinated to think about is the Blake Bargatze story. A healthy 24 year old with the waiting to see attitude one day then in 3 different Hospitals for over 90 days needing both lungs replaced. He wishes he got vaccinated now I’ll bet he does. If you don’t know how much a hospital cost per day look it up.

Here is San Mateo County’s announcement from today.

Counties of San Mateo, Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco, Santa Clara, Sonoma, and the City of Berkeley Recommend Masking Indoors for Everyone as a Precaution Against Increased Circulation of COVID-19

Leave a comment

Filed under #SanMateoCountyNews, #WEARAMASK, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019

University of California Vaccine Mandate

By Michael G. Stogner

That’s pretty simple All students, faculty and staff must be vaccinated to attend.

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The University of California is reversing course and will require all students, staff and faculty to be vaccinated against the coronavirus this fall.

UC President Michael Drake “does plan to move forward with the vaccine mandate,” Regent Eloy Oritz Oakley told the San Francisco Chronicle on Monday.

The decision is an about-face from a proposed policy announced in April requiring vaccinations only after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration fully approved at least one of the three vaccines now being administered under emergency authorization. It’s not clear when the FDA will give full approval.

Oakley said the regents have not been briefed on the new decision but that more information is expected at their two-day meeting that starts July 21.

UC has more than 280,000 students and 227,000 faculty and staff, and expects to return to mostly in-person instruction at its 10 campuses starting in August.

UC has already said it would exempt students from the vaccination requirement if they have medical or religious reasons.

California State University officials said Monday they were still planning to wait for full FDA approval before mandating COVID vaccinations — but that could change.

“We will continue to evaluate the situation as we get closer to the fall term,” CSU spokesperson Michael Uhlenkamp told the Chronicle.

Leave a comment

Filed under #SanMateoCountyNews, #WEARAMASK, CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Citizen Journalist, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019, Michael G. Stogner, Regent Elroy Ortiz Oakley, UC President Michael Drake, University of California, Vaccine Mandate