By Michael G. Stogner
Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos
June 20, 2017 Judges Meeting: The Hon. Judge Lisa Novak: She had made a finding that SMCSO Sergeant Michael E. Otte Perjured Himself in her courtroom on January 5, 2017.
WHAT HAPPENED NEXT to SMCSO Sergeant Michael E. Otte?
How many of San Mateo County Employees knew about SMCSO Sergeant Michael E. Otte committing crimes in the Rachel Amanda Quintana case and did NOTHING to protect the San Mateo County resident.
SMCSO Lt. John Kovach (husband of SMCSO Christina Corpus) was responsible for an Internal Affairs Investigation, How did that “Investigation” go?
What happens when a San Mateo County Sheriff Sergeant files a false Instrument (document) with the court PC115(a) FELONY. Or Lies under oath, for most of us that is known as PERJURY and is a bad thing. Not for Sergeant Mike Otte.
In a response to the Commission on Judicial Performance .
The Commission on Judicial Performance, established in 1960, is the independent state agency responsible for investigating complaints of judicial misconduct and judicial incapacity and for disciplining judges, pursuant to article VI, section 18 of the California Constitution.
Somebody filed a complaint against Judge Novak because she notified all the Judges present at the June 20, 2017 Judges Meeting, She had made a finding that SMCSO Sergeant Michael E. Otte Perjured Himself in her courtroom.
The person or persons who filed the complaint was not concerned at all by the fact that a SMC Sheriff Sergeant would lie under oath in her court, the person and the CJP was only concerned that she informed all the Judges who attended.
She noted the close relationship between the Sheriffs Office and the Court and cited the need to have an unqualified trust relationship with this partner.
Lets look at this unqualified trust relationship with the Sheriff’s Office under the leadership of Carlos G. Bolanos.
October 3, 2018 In-Custody Homicide of Chinedu V. Okobi three False News Releases. Omitting 6th Sheriff Employee for starters.
September 14, 2019 San Mateo County Sheriff Sergeant Lou Aquino DUI arrested by RWCPD Sheriff Bolanos refuses to release the Booking Photo. Why?
San Mateo County former Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez criminal case going for more than 7.5 years with the sole purpose to cause harm to him physically, mentally and financially. The public might recall the big Press Conference claiming Nobody is above the law in San Mateo County and Charging Deputy Lopez with Smuggling a Cellphone and Drugs to a Hells Angel member in Jail. Sheriff Carlos Bolanos knew there was No Evidence to support those charges.
These are just three current examples unqualified trust relationship with the Sheriff’s Office under the leadership of Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos.
An older example when Carlos G. Bolanos was Undersheriff 2010 the Brave Female Deputy reporting the 45 San Mateo County Sheriff Male Employees receiving and sharing Porn and Violent Rape Video on County Computers. What happened to those 45 male employees? Nothing.
It is my experience that Judges in San Mateo County have allowed Sheriff Employees and District Attorney Employees and County Counsel Employees to lie/file false instruments and give False Testimony on a daily basis, this is the Norm it shouldn’t be.
I say you can’t possibly manage what you don’t measure.
Lets find out exactly what happened after Hon. Judge Lisa Novak made a finding that SMCSO Sergeant Michael E. Otte Perjured Himself in her courtroom.
Commission on Judicial Performance Report
San Mateo County News 
(12) comments
Anna Schuessler Daily Journal staff has this statement wrong–Lopez will next appear in court Jan. 25 to set a new jury trial date for the embezzlement, perjury and election fraud charges and is out of custody on a $170,000 bail bond, according to prosecutors.
Jan. 25, 2018 is to hear the motion for 2nd case remaining charges.
SM Daily Journal , please contact his attorney for clarification.
To correct the San Mateo Daily Journal, former Deputy Juan Pablo Lopez next court hearing is January 25, 2018. I am requesting the newspaper to contact his attorney about this date.
Let’s see if the local media covers Mr. Juan Pablo Lopez ( Former SMC Deputy ) on his next hearings.
I hope the local and national media will follow the rest of this case, I am sure the rest of the phony charges will be dropped.
When will the San Mateo County public/voters going to wake up?
San Mateo County District Attorney’s office is trying to destroy former Deputy Sheriff Juan Lopez.
I hope someone will get this to the national media.
I can only imagine how much money this is causing former Deputy Juan Lopez.
PLEASE HELP GET THIS OUT TO EVERYONE!!!
Let me get this straight. Wagstaffe’s little pal Sheriff Munks and Under-sheriff Carlos Bolanos are caught going into a house of underaged trafficked prostitution in Las Vegas in 2007, for their own recreation. Wagstaffe defends them to the hilt and says they did nothing wrong. He sweeps it under the rug.
But when a clean deputy decides to run against the corruption of the San Mateo Sheriff, Wagstaffe and Munks punish him by cooking up suspect charges that don’t hold up light when examined AND hold a big press conference to announce it? Lopez wasn’t the one caught going into a place with underaged trafficked girls. The fact that someone dared to challenge the corrupt sheriff angered Wagstaffe and Munks. Something is rotten in San Mateo County
Great statements!!!!
research about Mr. Lopez and San Mateo the last 3 years is quite a story.
if the con wrote a letter exonerating Lopez,why was it a case for 3 years?
The District Attorney’s Office withheld the letters from the Grand Jury, and offered a not so truthful representation of what the Jailhouse snitch actually said. To this day there has been ZERO evidence that Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez was connected to the cellphone/s and drugs, and the DA’s Office has always known that fact. Disgusting behavior.
It’s about time, After over 3 years of the District Attorney’s lies and false charges against Former Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez and others a Judge finally got to see what the DA’s office has done. It shouldn’t take over 3 years to present your side of a case. This dismissal makes 4 for 4 defendants charges dismissed.
San Mateo County D.A.’s office has a long list of cases of injustice, for the people who know, lies are not too uncommon.