Who was San Mateo County Sheriff Lieutenant Michael Leishman Talking/Texting to in San Mateo County on July 19, 2022 while on his Special Ops case in Indiana?
Lt. Michael Leishman is the Big Guy playing with his phone.
There are still so many questions unanswered? Why is that?
People vs. Juan Pablo Lopez case NF433910A in Court today 2G at 11:00AM
This is a status hearing which could be quickly and safely conducted by ZOOM. Last Friday at 9:15AM Katrina Bihl the Court Clerk asked Juan Lopez if he knew where his attorney was. He told her to check her e-mails that one of his attorneys has Covid and she has been and is available by ZOOM. The clerk responded this court does not allow ZOOM. I had to laugh out loud. The clerk than went to her desk and attempted to call Juan’s attorney at her law office. Any reasonable person would know that a person who tested positive would most likely not go into the office. Juan Lopez stood up and offered his attorneys’ cell phone number to the clerk twice. After the clerk was unable to reach the attorney at her office by phone she hung up, that is when Juan offered the cellphone number again for the third time.
You might be wondering why would the Hon. Judge Joseph Scott not allow ZOOM in the Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez case. A safe guess would be shortly after Tony Serra, filed a declaration with the Court stating “Judge Joseph Scott has Perjured Himself”.
“I realize that Judge Scott now knows that I know he has perjured himself by not admitting to uttering the statement as alleged in Mr. Lopez motion for disqualification for cause.”
“Further Judge Scott has sought to influence his staff, including his clerk, by asking them about the statement and insinuating that they should say he did not make it and go along with his position on the matter.”
Personally I have no idea why the Hon. Judge Joseph Scott didn’t recuse himself when ret. Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez quietly and respectfully requested he do so.
Think about this, How many San Mateo County Elected Officials and Employees were involved in the False Charges filed against San Mateo County Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez way back in 2014.
Who do you think is AUDITING the District Attorneys Office for Honest Charges? Prosecutorial Misconduct?
Fix’n San Mateo County should be interested in the Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez case, they are NOT. Why? Why is no newspaper in San Mateo County reporting on this case?
Remember Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez was arrested with guns to his head at his home while he was on administrative leave, he was charged with Smuggling a cellphone and drugs into Maguire Jail.
How many of you have ever followed up to find out what happened to those charges?
They were FALSE.
If you support Law Enforcement like I do and you feel safe enough to come into the 400 County Center Building during a Pandemic, I invite you to join me at 11:00 AM in 2G.
Voters Cast: 75,776 of 433,539 (17.48%) Estimated number of ballots left to process as of June 9: 77,000. That means 152,776 qualified ballots have been returned to San Mateo County as of June 9, 2022. It also means there are more ballots to be counted today than was reported on June 7, 2022.
Elections and Ballot counting should be simple math easy to understand.
The Important number is always the same, How many ballots total were returned on time to the San Mateo County Elections Office for the June 7, 2022 Election.
Without this number being made public right from the beginning, the public will never have confidence in the results. A good example was the 2018 YES on W Measure by San Mateo County Neighbors for Congestion Relief. That measure lost every single reporting date right up until the last two and then it passed by a very small margin.
Mark Church is showing that number to be 63,359 out of the 433,539 registered voters.
IMHO one of the Most Exciting Elections Race if you could call it that this one.
So far 45,684 San Mateo County Voters voted for DDA Sharon Cho to be a JUDGE.
You will remember she was the Prosecutor of Zain Jaffer in 2017. He was arrested by the Hillsborough Police Department for Attempted Murder of his 3 year old son. HPD wore Body Worn Cameras. Everybody and their mothers know what happened to that case right?
When did the Hon. Judge Joseph Scott decide to Not run for Re-Election? Why did Hon. Judge Joseph Scott decide to Not run for Re-Election?
Judge of the Superior Court, Office No. 4 (Vote for 1)
Robert Foucrault why did you ignore the Family’s CPRA request?
On February 27, 2020, the Coroner published an autopsy report finding that Munir Edais had died of “suicide by hanging” and set his time of death was 2:41 a.m. on the morning of January 21.
Substantial material evidence casts doubt on both of those findings.
What is the EVIDENCE Munir Edais a 32 year old Police Officer, Father of two girls, Husband of less than 6 months, San Mateo County Resident all his life Hung Himself?
Robert Foucrault, why are you and David Silberman fighting so hard to keep your Work Product a Secret from the Parents of Munir Edais. Is that part of your job description?
Are you telling the 760,000 Residents of San Mateo County to trust your findings? Have you ever made a mistake, or changed your findings for ANY reason.
Robert, what were/are your thoughts about the Nanny Camera located in Bedroom #2 the same bedroom you say Munir Edais Hung Himself? Your Team never mentioned it, WHY?
Please sign and share Munir Edais R.I.P. story, for some reason the San Mateo County Media never reported this Suspicious Death of a Police Officer in Daly City, California. Let’s find out why?
Ask your friends and family members in Law Enforcement why they haven’t signed this Petition?
Ask all San Mateo County Employees why they haven’t signed this Petition?
This case should be studied in every Law School in the United States of America.
On Monday January 3, 2022 at 10:00 AM the Hon. Judge Elizabeth M. Hill will hear a Motion to Destroy all of the Records and Body Worn Camera Video from the Hillsborough Police Department. This same motion was on calendar for December 20, 2021 where DDA Sharon Cho informed Judge Barbara Mallach that the District Attorney’s Office had ISSUES with this and filed a Motion to Continue which was Granted.
These Records have been sealed from the very beginning, the Public has never had access to these records. Why? Here is the Very Little information that we do know.
From: Steve Wagstaffe Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 4:01 PM
To: Emily Mibach Subject: People v. Jaffer Hi Emily, Here is the description of the testimony by the instructor: DEFENSE THEN CALLED MARTIN ROMUALDEZ, D’S JIU-JITSU INSTRUCTOR FOR 6 MTHS PRIOR TO INCIDENT, AND THEN CALLED OFC REY. MR. ROMUALDEZ TESTIFIED THAT WHAT HE OBSERVED ON THE BODY CAM FOOTAGES WAS THE DEF PERFORMING A JIU-JITSU MOVE THAT HE HAD BEEN TRAINED IN (ARM BAR/TRIANGLE). MR. ROMUALDEZ ADMITTED HOWEVER THAT IN THE NUMEROUS PRACTICE SESSIONS WHERE D AND HIS SON JOHN DOE WERE INVOLVED THAT D WAS NEVER NAKED, THAT IT DID NOT RESULT IN ANY SCREAMING ON THE PART OF JOHN DOE, THAT JOHN DOE DID NOT APPEAR TO BE IN PAIN, THAT JOHN DOE WAS NEVER INJURED OR TAKEN TO THE HOSPITAL. INSTRUCTOR FURTHER ADMITTED THERE IS NO JIU-JITSU MOVE THAT INVOLVES INSERTING FINGERS INTO ONE’S ANUS OR SELF-STIMULATING IN THAT MANNER, AND THAT THE PRACTICE SESSION S WITH D AND HIS SON NEVER INVOLVED ANY KIND OF TRASH TALK OR LANGUAGE SUCH AS “PUSSY.”
Remember John Doe was Zain Jaffer’s 3 year old son.
The Odyssey Portal Superior Court Records for People vs. Zainali Jaffer 17NF012415A shows this criminal case was first filed on February 13, 2018. That is 14 days after Steve Wagstaffe’s e-mail to reporter Emily. How does that happen?
Was Steve Wagstaffe’s e-mail to Emily Mibach a Violation of the Court Order to Seal the Preliminary Hearing Transcripts?
Click on Search Case Records, Click on Accept, lower right hand corner, Click Odyssey Portal, Click Odyssey Portal No Registration Required, Scroll to bottom, Click Odyssey Public Portal, Click Smart Search, enter 17NF012415A
Dear Hon. Judge Leland Davis III on November 22, 2021, You cancelled the Public Telephone Access to the San Mateo County Courts. I’m asking you to reverse that decision.
Public Access Policy Updated 11/22/21 – The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect; proceedings are open to the public to attend in person.
As you can see by the Alert issued today, It would be safer for the Public to listen on the phone.
COVID ALERT FOR
SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RISK INCREASED
on 12/23/2021Note that risk is reduced for those who are vaccinated.
As some of you know I have been working on Making San Mateo County Safer since 2000. I’ve always thought and I still do that Accurate and Honest Reporting and Data of Court Cases is a MUST in order to Make San Mateo County Safer for the Residents. The Zain Jaffer case is just one simple example I will give today.
Facts: October 15, 2017 4:00 AM Hillsborough, San Mateo County, California Zainali Jaffer 29 was arrested by the Hillsborough Police Department for Attempted Murder of his 3 year old son.
He was never charged with Attempted Murder of a Child, by SMCDA Steve Wagstaffe.
Below is the Odyssey Portals Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo official record of Zain Jaffer’s court case. You will see the case was filed on Febraury 13, 2018. See if you can find the date the Preliminary Hearing was held? Also note this case was DISMISSED on July 2, 2018 that is FAST.
Case Information
17-NF-012415-A | The People of the State of California vs. Zainali Jaffer
Case Number17-NF-012415-ACourt CriminalFile Date 02/13/2018Case Type InformationCase Status Dismissed
Party
DefendantJaffer, Zainali
DOBXX/XX/XXXX
Active Attorneys
Lead Attorney
OLMOS, DANIEL
Retained
Attorney
CLANCY, PATRICK E.
Retained
Charge
Charges Jaffer, Zainali
Bond
Description
Statute
Level
Date
001
PC664/288.7(b)-FEL-Attempted:Oral Copulation Or Sexual Penetration With Child 10 Years Old Or Younge664-288.7(b)Felony10/15/2017
002
PC288(b)(1)-FEL-Forcible Lewd Act Upon Child288(b)(1)Felony10/15/2017
003
PC245(a)(4)-FEL-Assault By Means Likely To Produce Great Bodily Injury245(a)(4)Felony10/15/2017
004
PC245(a)(4)-FEL-Assault By Means Likely To Produce Great Bodily Injury245(a)(4)Felony10/15/2017
005
PC273A(a)-FEL-Child Abuse273A(a)Felony10/15/2017
006
PC273A(a)-FEL-Child Abuse273A(a)Felony10/15/2017
007
PC243(b)-MISD-Battery Upon A Peace Officer And Designated Persons243(b)Misdemeanor10/15/2017
Bond Type
Bond Number
Bond Amount
Current Bond Status
Surety Bond
A3H-0000476$300,000.00Exonerated
Disposition Events
02/15/2018Plea
Judicial Officer Garratt, Stephanie
001
PC664/288.7(b)-FEL-Attempted:Oral Copulation Or Sexual Penetration With Child 10 Years Old Or Younge
Not Guilty
002
PC288(b)(1)-FEL-Forcible Lewd Act Upon Child
Not Guilty
003
PC245(a)(4)-FEL-Assault By Means Likely To Produce Great Bodily Injury
Not Guilty
004
PC245(a)(4)-FEL-Assault By Means Likely To Produce Great Bodily Injury
Not Guilty
005
PC273A(a)-FEL-Child Abuse
Not Guilty
006
PC273A(a)-FEL-Child Abuse
Not Guilty
007
PC243(b)-MISD-Battery Upon A Peace Officer And Designated Persons
Not Guilty
07/02/2018Disposition
Judicial OfficerGarratt, Stephanie
001
PC664/288.7(b)-FEL-Attempted:Oral Copulation Or Sexual Penetration With Child 10 Years Old Or Younge
Dismissal: Insufficient Evidence
002
PC288(b)(1)-FEL-Forcible Lewd Act Upon Child
Dismissal: Insufficient Evidence
003
PC245(a)(4)-FEL-Assault By Means Likely To Produce Great Bodily Injury
Dismissal: Insufficient Evidence
004
PC245(a)(4)-FEL-Assault By Means Likely To Produce Great Bodily Injury
Dismissal: Insufficient Evidence
005
PC273A(a)-FEL-Child Abuse
Dismissal: Insufficient Evidence
006
PC273A(a)-FEL-Child Abuse
Dismissal: Insufficient Evidence
007
PC243(b)-MISD-Battery Upon A Peace Officer And Designated Persons
Defendant: Jaffer, ZainaliAttorney: CLANCY, PATRICK E.
06/25/2018 Time continues to be waived.
06/25/2018 Previous dates remain as set
06/25/2018 Defendant ordered to return.
06/25/2018 Defendant remains on bail.
07/02/2018 Pretrial Conference
Judicial Officer Garratt, StephanieHearing Time1:30 PMResult Held
Parties Present
Defendant: Jaffer, ZainaliAttorney: CLANCY, PATRICK E.
07/02/2018 Motion granted.
Comment PEOPLE’S MTD
07/02/2018 Confidential Notice of Termination of Protective Order in
Comment criminal proceedings filed.
08/17/2018 Order
Comment Application and order directing the release of Exhibits introduced by the defense by the defense to the attorneys for the defense, Patrick Clancy and his associate William P. Daley
Comment order sealing preliminary hearing transcripts
08/29/2018 Order
Comment Signed Confirmation of pickup Exhibits
08/31/2018 Sealed Document by Order of the Court
Comment declaration and request for order sealing application and for temporary order sealing transcript
11/18/2021 Petition to Seal and Destroy Arrest Record Filed (PC 851.8)
Comment CR-409 Petition to Seal Arrest & Related Records PC 851.91
12/20/2021 Motion hearings
Original Type Motion hearingsJudicial Officer Mallach, Barbara J.Hearing Time10:00 AMResult HeldComment PC 851.91
12/20/2021 Waiver of personal appearance
12/20/2021 Attorney appeared on behalf of defendant
Comment Pezhman Pakmeshan
12/20/2021 Party appeared by audio and/or video
Comment DA & Atty
12/20/2021 Motion granted.
01/03/2022 Motion hearings
Judicial Officer Crim PJ, –Hearing Time10:00 AMComment PC 851.91
Yesterday DDA Sharon Cho informed Hon. Judge Barbara Mallach that there are some issues and requested this Motion be continued. That motion was granted next court date is January 3, 2022.
Zain JafferD.A. Stephen M. WagstaffeKaren Guidotti
Upadte: This Motion to Destroy has been continued to January 3, 2022
Today December 20, 2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2A the Hon Judge Barbara Mallach will rule on a Motion to Destroy all of the records in the People vs. Zainali Jaffer case 17NF012415A. The Public is invited to attend in person.
Who filed the Motion to Destroy all records and Body Worn Camera Video?
I call this the “Magic Case” because of the “Magic Meeting” held on June 7, 2018
Who is speaking for the two Children?
Diminished Capacity is No Excuse for Criminal Conduct
This case should be taught at every law school in the United States of America. NOT Destroyed.