Category Archives: Particle Media Inc

James Brown was given $10M of Great Condition PPE. The question remains by WHO? and Why?

By Michael G. Stogner

Before any more crimes are committed, I recommend the San Mateo County Supervisors contact James Brown, let him know you are sorry for the mix up, that whoever gave him the $10,000,000 of PPE did not have the authority to do so. Offer him $10,000 for his time and thank him for volunteering in the first place. San Mateo County should be distributing this PPE it’s in Geat Condition. Get it to the people in San Mateo County.

James Brown CEO West Coast Solutions Inc. San Carlos, San Mateo County 4D’s ago

“We are working hard on getting this into the hands of organizations and groups that need it. Fortunately most of it is in Great condition, vacuum sealed in plastic and only the outer card board was damaged in many cases. Also there was quite a bit stored indoors.

Why James Brown? isn’t there one employee in San Mateo County who has the capability and skill set to distribute the $9,000,000 of PPE that is in GREAT CONDITION according to him. It should be distributed to San Mateo County period.

If it’s in great condition today January 20, 2022 just think it must have been in great or perfect condition from the time SMC took possession of it, which to this still remains unknown.

When did SMC get this $10M of PPE?

Was it one shipment? what dates? Who signed for it?

Why didn’t SMC distribute it right after they got it?

Why doesn’t San Mateo County distribute it today?

It was No Mistake that this $10M PPE was left outside, It was ordered to be moved outside, part of the plan.

San Mateo Event Center Manager DANA STOEHR: “It’s, it was fully taken care of exactly the way it should have been.”

Good Luck San Mateo County

Leave a comment

Filed under #corruptionmatters, #newsbreak, #SanMateoCountyNews.com, $10M PPE left outside San Mateo County, Apnews.com, Associated Press, Axios.com, Bay Area News Group, Bay Area Transparency, Bay Cities News Foundation, bizjournals, Blackstone, bloomberg.com, Board of Supervisors, businessinsider, California Judicial Branch News Service, Charles Stone, Citizen Journalist, City of San Carlos, Congresswoman Ana Eshoo, Congresswoman Jackie Speier, Dan Noyes Investigative Reporter ABC News, DANA STOEHR: "It's, it was fully taken care of exactly the way it should have been.", DEM has graciously donated to the Wine Country Marines, Don Horsley, Fair and Level Playing Field, FBI, Federal Funds, Felony misappropriation of public money., FEMA, forbes.com, Foster City News, Global SaaS founders, executives and venture capitalists, Google, Government Hiding the Obvious, I don't need to be invited, I'm a Tax Payer, James Brown CEO - West Coast Security, San Carlos, James Brown mentioned "Money Laundering", James Brown of the Wine Country Marines, Just because somebody says something is True doesn't mean that it is., KSBW 8 Reporter Feliz Cortez, Local Media Consortium, Los Angeles Times., Making San Mateo County Safer, medium.com, Michael G. Stogner, Money Laundering, Monterey Naval Postgraduate School, Never too late to Investigate, Newsbreakapp.com, newsbreezer.com, newsindiatimes.com, Nobody is above the Law except "Those Who Matter", only the outer card board was damaged in many cases. Also there was quite a bit stored indoors., Organized Crime, Particle Media Inc, Perjury, prnewsonline.com, Protect the Residents of California, Public Corruption, Public Trust, Recology San Mateo County, Rob Bonta Attorney General of California, S.F. Gate, SaaS Community, SaaStr CEO and Founder Jason Lemkin., SamTrans Fraud Investigation, San Mateo County Department Emergency Management, San Mateo County Event Center CEO, Dana Stoehr, San Mateo County Government has NO Oversight., San Mateo County Investigating Itself., San Mateo County Manager Mike Callagy, San Mateo County Money Laundering, San Mateo County News.com, San Mateo County Sheriff's Office Investigated Itself SAL, sanfrancisco.cbslocal, Silicon Valley, SiliconValley.com, Single Point Data Base for Whistleblowers, Stop and Pause, Stop the Give Away of $10M PPE Today, Susan J. Bassi, Those Who Matter, Victim's Advocate, Violation of Oath, Wine Country Marines, Wine Country Marines Facebook page, Zain Jaffer Wants to Help Others

Six4Three vs. Facebook in Court today.

By Michael G. Stogner

CIV533328 | SIX4THREE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY vs FACEBOOK, INC, A DELAWARE CORPORATION

Today 2 P.M. Courtroom 2J

If you think you are going to sue Facebook. I recommend you pack a lunch, this is going to take awhile. This case was filed in 2015.

01/07/2022 Complex Case Management Conference

Original Type
Complex Case Management Conference

Complex Case Management Conference 01/07/2022 ~CIV Minute Order

Judicial Officer
Foiles, Robert D

Hearing Time
2:00 PM

Result
Held Parties Present

Plaintiff

Attorney: BATHAEE, YAVAR

Attorney: DUNNE, BRIAN J.

Defendant

Attorney: MEHTA, SONAL N

Defendant

Attorney: MEHTA, SONAL N

Defendant

Attorney: MEHTA, SONAL N

Defendant

Attorney: MEHTA, SONAL N

Defendant

Attorney: MEHTA, SONAL N

Defendant

Attorney: MEHTA, SONAL N

Defendant

Attorney: MEHTA, SONAL N

Participant

Attorney: BATHAEE, YAVAR

Attorney: DUNNE, BRIAN J.

Participant

Attorney: RUSSO, JACK

01/07/2022 Party appeared by audio and/or video

Comment
Above Noted Counsel & Facebook/Meta In House Counsel Ariel Ruiz. Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Andrew Williamson and Edward Grauman on behalf of the Plaintiff.

01/07/2022 Notice of Hearing re

Clerk's Notice of Hearing

Comment
Anti-Slapp Motion as to Individual Defendants on 01/28/22 at 2:00 pm

Next court date:

  • 02/18/2022 Objections to Report of Special Master Judicial Officer
    Foiles, Robert D Hearing Time
    2:00 PM Comment
    Objection to Discovery Special Master’s Report & Recommendation




Leave a comment

Filed under #newsbreak, #SanMateoCountyNews.com, Apnews.com, Associated Press, Axios.com, Bay Area Transparency, Bay Cities News Foundation, Bing, Blackstone, bloomberg.com, BUSINESS WIRE, businessinsider, Citizen Journalist, CIV533328 | SIX4THREE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY vs FACEBOOK, INC, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, dailyhunt.in, Damian Collins, dishdash.com, Fair and Level Playing Field, forbes.com, fundraisingradio.com, geekfence.com, Google, Hon. Judge Robert Foiles, https://missionlocal.org, https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-infotagion-podcast-with-damian-collins-mp/id1508368185, Indiawest.com, Just because somebody says something is True doesn't mean that it is., Kaizen Technology Partners, KQED, livemint.com, Local Media Consortium, Los Angeles Times., Making San Mateo County Safer, Mark Zuckerberg, McKinsey & Company, medium.com, menafn.com, metro.co.uk, Michael G. Stogner, muckrack.com, New Media Investment Group, Newsbreakapp.com, newsbreezer.com, newsindiatimes.com, Newsweek, Nobody is above the Law except "Those Who Matter", Palantir & Tiberius, PANDEMIC, Particle Media Inc, prnewsonline.com, Public Corruption, Recordings of Court Cases Must be Allowed, Reuters, S.F. Gate, San Mateo County News.com, Silicon Valley, Single Point Data Base for Whistleblowers, Sitrick and Company, sramanamitra.com, Techcrunch.com, techsnip.com, Telephone Public Access Discontinued by Who knows Who., The Auditor, The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal,, Those Who Matter, Time, U.S. News and World Report., UK Parliament, USA Today, Venturebeat.com, Victim's Advocate, vox.com, Vungle, Whistleblowers, wiki.ng, Yahoo, Yahoo Search, yro.slashdot.org

Family Court Judges, Rule on Unvaccinated Parents and Children. “This child needs to be protected.”

By Michael G. Stogner

Everybody and their mother knew this day was coming, as if Family Law Courts were not expensive enough as they are. But this is an issue that the parents are bringing on themselves. Judges around the Country are making rulings to protect the Children when one of the Parents chooses not too. Also now being Vaccinated is part of the Custody equation. If a parent refuses to get vaccinated or refuses to get his/her children vaccinated it could/will impact the outcome of which parent gets custody.

Today LATIMES Article

Family courts weigh in on vaccinations
What happens when one divorced parent hasn’t gotten the shot? Judges take up issue.
By Emily Alpert Reyes
Flanked by their lawyers, the divorced parents hashed out an agreement outside the Pasadena courtroom and returned to inform the judge: They had agreed their young son would get the COVID-19 vaccine.
“Absolutely he needs to be vaccinated,” Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Harvey A. Silberman said.
Then he asked the parents: “Are the two of you vaccinated?”
The mother said yes. The father said no. “Sir, you better get vaccinated,” the judge said, according to a court transcript. “Or you could very well lose time with your child unless you have a medical reason not to.”
As children and teens have become eligible for COVID-19 shots, divorced parents have clashed in court over whether to get kids vaccinated. In some cases — including the one now before a judge in Los Angeles County — family courts have also started to weigh in on parents being vaccinated against the coronavirus.
In Illinois, a judge made headlines after ruling that a mother could not see her 11-year-old son until she had gotten vaccinated, a decision that was later rescinded.
In New York, a father was suspended from visits unless he got vaccinated or underwent regular testing. “The danger of voluntarily remaining unvaccinated during access with a child while the COVID-19 virus remains a threat to children’s health and safety cannot be understated,” Judge Matthew F. Cooper wrote.
Attorney Lloyd C. Rosen, who represents the New York father, said his client is getting tested regularly in order to keep seeing his daughter but has filed a notice to preserve his right to appeal the ruling.
Rosen argued that the court had overstepped. Vaccinations and other medical decisions often come up in custody cases, since “it’s not uncommon for parents to disagree regarding medical care or treatment for a child,” he said.
“Here the court is not stepping in and making a decision for the child that the parents can’t make,” Rosen said.
“The court here is stepping in and making a decision for a parent regarding themselves — as a condition to their parental rights.”
Cooper, the judge in that case, wrote that the question was not whether he could require an adult to be vaccinated, which “would stretch the authority of a matrimonial court to unprecedented lengths,” but whether the mother could make vaccination or testing a condition of the father visiting the child.
At the L.A. County hearing, the divorced father said he had medical reasons for not being vaccinated, but Silberman seemed skeptical. In a court order, he directed the father to either provide a medical exemption from his doctor or show that he had gotten vaccinated against COVID-19.
If the father genuinely has a health reason for not getting vaccinated, “I want to know what the medical evidence is,” Silberman said during the hearing. “This child needs to be protected.”
The move surprised attorney Patrick Baghdaserians, who represents the mother. Although Baghdaserians said he is aware of judges supporting COVID-19 shots for children when the issue has arisen in custody cases, “I’ve never seen a judge take the next step, which is … if one of the parents is not vaccinated, that potentially exposes the child to harm.”
Baghdaserians praised the judge and said that if the order were ignored, his client would seek to change the custody arrangement. The mother is supportive of COVID-19 vaccination, he said.
Attorney Alphonse Provinziano, who represents the father, said his client had asked him not to comment on his specific case. He said that in general, California family courts have wide latitude to seek information from parents, but he was unaware of any legal authority for them to change custody based on vaccination status.
Provinziano said it’s possible that someone could try to make such a case by arguing that, “ ‘Well, I don’t think it’s in the best interests of the child’ ” for a parent to not be vaccinated. But “that, I think, would end up going to the Supreme Court of California. … It would be a heavily litigated case.”
Provinziano also argued that, in general, if a parent has a medical reason to not be vaccinated, “you can’t use that disability to say that you’re somehow unable to be a parent to your child.” He pointed to a California ruling that found courts cannot use a physical disability as evidence of whether someone is a fit parent.
The Times is not naming the parents involved in the court case in order to protect the privacy of their child.
In response to questions sent for the judge, a Los Angeles County Superior Court spokeswoman said Silberman was prohibited under ethics canons from making any public comments on a pending case.
Rachel Rebouché, interim dean at Temple University Beasley School of Law, said most state statutes that govern child custody are very broad, centering on “the best interests of the child.”
For instance, courts have been able to restrict visitation rights if a parent lives with a partner who is deemed unsafe for the child, Rebouché said.
In California, courts scrutinize the ability of parents to care for the child, she said, so “whether or not the parent will seek to protect the child from COVID is relevant to the court.”
Still, Rebouché said the L.A. County case and others raise questions about “where are the lines that you draw for what courts can permissibly require parents to do with threat of a custody loss.”
If some people see not getting vaccinated as an issue of religious freedom, “is losing time with a child a denial of that right? Or is it something else?” she asked.
John F. Banzhaf III, professor emeritus of public interest law at George Washington University Law School, argued that there is a strong precedent for courts’ limiting visitation for unvaccinated parents: child custody cases involving cigarette smokers. Family courts have ordered parents who smoke to stop doing so in their homes for 24 or 48 hours before a child visits, Banzhaf said.
In some cases, judges have denied custody to a parent because “the very fact that you would continue smoking around the child, knowing the risk, knowing how widely publicized the risks are, suggests to me a lack of concern” for their health, Banzhaf said.
The legal debate revolves around the protective effects of the vaccines not just for the recipient, but for children and teens around them. Vaccinated people can spread the virus, but health officials have stressed they are much less likely to get infected in the first place, reducing the likelihood they will pass it along.
Rosen, the attorney representing the New York father, argued that even if the father got vaccinated, that would not eliminate the possibility of him getting and transmitting the coronavirus. He also noted that the child goes to day care with other children.
“There’s just so many different ways this child could be exposed to COVID that to single out the father and make his access conditional upon his vaccination status is not only inappropriate, but well beyond any kind of reasonable determination in the best interests of the child,” Rosen said.
Banzhaf argued there was strong evidence for the risks posed to a child by spending time inside with an unvaccinated parent. In fact, he said, “the evidence is far clearer than we used to have with regard to secondhand tobacco smoke” in custody cases.
What will happen for the father in the L.A. County court case remains to be seen. Silberman gave the man roughly a month to provide the documents he requested, which he would review privately.
At the November hearing, Silberman told the father, “I hope you do have a genuine health reason for preventing you from getting” the vaccine. “I just want to know what that is.”

This was totally Predictable, I recommend every person read the Crimson Contagion Functional Exercise of 2019. I did in March 2020.

Best of Health to everyone.

Leave a comment

Filed under "Danger of remaining unvaccinated", "Threat to Childrens Health and Safety, #newsbreak, #SanMateoCountyNews.com, #writingcommunity, Associated Press, “Absolutely he needs to be vaccinated,”, “Are the two of you vaccinated?”, “Sir, you better get vaccinated,”, “The court here is stepping in and making a decision for a parent regarding themselves — as a condition to their parental rights.”, California Judicial Branch News Service, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, Citizen Journalist, Coronavirus, COVID-19, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019, Google, John Myers LATIMES, Judge Matthew F. Cooper, LATIMES Reporter Emily Alpert Reyes, Local Media Consortium, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Harvey A. Silberman, Making San Mateo County Safer, Michael G. Stogner, Newsbreakapp.com, Particle Media Inc, prnewsonline.com, Protect the Children, Protect the Residents of California