Category Archives: Protect the Children

$10M PPE, San Mateo County Investigating Itself again. Bad Idea.

By Michael G. Stogner

The Residents, Elected Officials and Candidates are fine with that.

Most recently San Mateo County Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos, SMCSO Captain Christina Corpus, and Retired Sgt. Jeffrey Kearnan Investigated the Sheriff’s Activity League Embezzlement and Money Laundering that involved several people and hundreds of thousands of dollars.

photo by Dan Noyes

San Mateo County is going on the record to say that San Mateo County Manager Mike Callagy is the last person that should be involved in the Investigation of the reported $10,000,000 of Personal Protective Equipment PPE that was stored outside on the San Mateo County Event Centers property for more than three months. County Manager Mike Callagy is RESPONSIBLE.

A reasonable person would would know “He can not Investigate Himself” but don’t forget this is San Mateo County where the residents are fine with the Conflict of Interest, and “Those Who Matter.”

Congresswoman Jackie Speier said the Obvious. “It has to be investigated.”

What she did not say is by who?

So for now it’s early since this story was reported by Dan Noyes, the amount is $10,000,000.

It involves Federal Money.

It involves PPE not cleaning supplies.

It involves Brand New PPE not Surplus.

The cause of this damage is Negligence, Not California Rain.

Leave a comment

Filed under # SupervisorsToSupervise, #2americas, #corruptionmatters, #newsbreak,, $10M PPE left outside San Mateo County,, Associated Press,, “You don’t want to be investigating your own agency.", Bay Area News Group, Bay Area Transparency, Bay Cities News Foundation, bizjournals, Blackstone,, Board of Supervisors, BUSINESS WIRE, businessinsider, Charles Stone, Citizen Journalist, Correct the Record and Synchronize it with the known Facts, COVID-19, Creative narrative. , Crimson Contagion Functional Exercise 2019, Dan Noyes Investigative Reporter ABC News, Facebook, Fair and Level Playing Field, Felony misappropriation of public money.,, Foster City News, Google, I don't need to be invited, I'm a Tax Payer, James Brown of the Wine Country Marines, Just because somebody says something is True doesn't mean that it is., Local Media Consortium, Louise F. Rogers SMC Health, Making San Mateo County Safer,,, Michael G. Stogner, Modification of Sentence,, Negligence, Not California Rain., Never too late to Investigate, New Media Investment Group,,, Newsweek, Outrageous Government Conduct,, Protect Everyone, Protect the Children, Protect the Residents of California, Public Corruption, S.F. Gate, SAL Embezzlement & Laundering Investigation, SamTrans Fraud Investigation, San Mateo County Elected Officials have NO QUESTIONS, San Mateo County Event Center, San Mateo County Event Center CEO, Dana Stoehr, San Mateo County Government has NO Oversight., San Mateo County Health, San Mateo County Manager Mike Callagy, San Mateo County, Scott Johnson Deputy Director of Risk Management San Mateo County., Sheriff Captain Christina Corpus Investigated SAL, Silicon Valley,, Stanford University, Tax Payer's Advocate, Those Who Matter, Victim's Advocate, Yahoo, Yahoo Search, YouTube Channel

San Mateo County, Protect the Children, It’s in the Air.

By Michael G. Stogner

Children under 5 can not be vaccinated yet. What are you going to do to PROTECT THEM?

Children ages 4 and younger hospitalized with COVID-19 increased by 791% in the last month.

335% for kids ages 5 to 11

1,047% for 12- to 18-year-olds in the same time period.


Children under 5 can not be vaccinated yet. COVID-19 particles are an airborne virus. You can’t see it or smell it.

Now think about smelling cigarette/cigar/BBQ you might not see the smoke in the air but you can smell it. That is how COVID-19 can infect people.

I recommend you read the Crimson Contagion Functional Exercise of 2019. What is happening today was Predictable.

Stay safe and protect the Children.

Leave a comment

Filed under "Threat to Childrens Health and Safety, #newsbreak,, #WEARAMASK,, Associated Press, Bay Cities News Foundation, Bing, Blackstone,, BUSINESS WIRE, businessinsider, CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Citizen Journalist, COVID-19, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019, East Bay Times, It's Serve & Protect NOT Serve & Infect, Los Angeles Times., Making San Mateo County Safer,, Michael G. Stogner,, New Media Investment Group,,, Newsweek,, Protect Everyone, Protect the Children, Protect the Residents of California, Quality of Life for San Mateo County, San Mateo County First Five, San Mateo County, San Mateo County SFO International Airport, U.S. News and World Report., USA Today, Victim's Advocate

Family Court Judges, Rule on Unvaccinated Parents and Children. “This child needs to be protected.”

By Michael G. Stogner

Everybody and their mother knew this day was coming, as if Family Law Courts were not expensive enough as they are. But this is an issue that the parents are bringing on themselves. Judges around the Country are making rulings to protect the Children when one of the Parents chooses not too. Also now being Vaccinated is part of the Custody equation. If a parent refuses to get vaccinated or refuses to get his/her children vaccinated it could/will impact the outcome of which parent gets custody.

Today LATIMES Article

Family courts weigh in on vaccinations
What happens when one divorced parent hasn’t gotten the shot? Judges take up issue.
By Emily Alpert Reyes
Flanked by their lawyers, the divorced parents hashed out an agreement outside the Pasadena courtroom and returned to inform the judge: They had agreed their young son would get the COVID-19 vaccine.
“Absolutely he needs to be vaccinated,” Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Harvey A. Silberman said.
Then he asked the parents: “Are the two of you vaccinated?”
The mother said yes. The father said no. “Sir, you better get vaccinated,” the judge said, according to a court transcript. “Or you could very well lose time with your child unless you have a medical reason not to.”
As children and teens have become eligible for COVID-19 shots, divorced parents have clashed in court over whether to get kids vaccinated. In some cases — including the one now before a judge in Los Angeles County — family courts have also started to weigh in on parents being vaccinated against the coronavirus.
In Illinois, a judge made headlines after ruling that a mother could not see her 11-year-old son until she had gotten vaccinated, a decision that was later rescinded.
In New York, a father was suspended from visits unless he got vaccinated or underwent regular testing. “The danger of voluntarily remaining unvaccinated during access with a child while the COVID-19 virus remains a threat to children’s health and safety cannot be understated,” Judge Matthew F. Cooper wrote.
Attorney Lloyd C. Rosen, who represents the New York father, said his client is getting tested regularly in order to keep seeing his daughter but has filed a notice to preserve his right to appeal the ruling.
Rosen argued that the court had overstepped. Vaccinations and other medical decisions often come up in custody cases, since “it’s not uncommon for parents to disagree regarding medical care or treatment for a child,” he said.
“Here the court is not stepping in and making a decision for the child that the parents can’t make,” Rosen said.
“The court here is stepping in and making a decision for a parent regarding themselves — as a condition to their parental rights.”
Cooper, the judge in that case, wrote that the question was not whether he could require an adult to be vaccinated, which “would stretch the authority of a matrimonial court to unprecedented lengths,” but whether the mother could make vaccination or testing a condition of the father visiting the child.
At the L.A. County hearing, the divorced father said he had medical reasons for not being vaccinated, but Silberman seemed skeptical. In a court order, he directed the father to either provide a medical exemption from his doctor or show that he had gotten vaccinated against COVID-19.
If the father genuinely has a health reason for not getting vaccinated, “I want to know what the medical evidence is,” Silberman said during the hearing. “This child needs to be protected.”
The move surprised attorney Patrick Baghdaserians, who represents the mother. Although Baghdaserians said he is aware of judges supporting COVID-19 shots for children when the issue has arisen in custody cases, “I’ve never seen a judge take the next step, which is … if one of the parents is not vaccinated, that potentially exposes the child to harm.”
Baghdaserians praised the judge and said that if the order were ignored, his client would seek to change the custody arrangement. The mother is supportive of COVID-19 vaccination, he said.
Attorney Alphonse Provinziano, who represents the father, said his client had asked him not to comment on his specific case. He said that in general, California family courts have wide latitude to seek information from parents, but he was unaware of any legal authority for them to change custody based on vaccination status.
Provinziano said it’s possible that someone could try to make such a case by arguing that, “ ‘Well, I don’t think it’s in the best interests of the child’ ” for a parent to not be vaccinated. But “that, I think, would end up going to the Supreme Court of California. … It would be a heavily litigated case.”
Provinziano also argued that, in general, if a parent has a medical reason to not be vaccinated, “you can’t use that disability to say that you’re somehow unable to be a parent to your child.” He pointed to a California ruling that found courts cannot use a physical disability as evidence of whether someone is a fit parent.
The Times is not naming the parents involved in the court case in order to protect the privacy of their child.
In response to questions sent for the judge, a Los Angeles County Superior Court spokeswoman said Silberman was prohibited under ethics canons from making any public comments on a pending case.
Rachel Rebouché, interim dean at Temple University Beasley School of Law, said most state statutes that govern child custody are very broad, centering on “the best interests of the child.”
For instance, courts have been able to restrict visitation rights if a parent lives with a partner who is deemed unsafe for the child, Rebouché said.
In California, courts scrutinize the ability of parents to care for the child, she said, so “whether or not the parent will seek to protect the child from COVID is relevant to the court.”
Still, Rebouché said the L.A. County case and others raise questions about “where are the lines that you draw for what courts can permissibly require parents to do with threat of a custody loss.”
If some people see not getting vaccinated as an issue of religious freedom, “is losing time with a child a denial of that right? Or is it something else?” she asked.
John F. Banzhaf III, professor emeritus of public interest law at George Washington University Law School, argued that there is a strong precedent for courts’ limiting visitation for unvaccinated parents: child custody cases involving cigarette smokers. Family courts have ordered parents who smoke to stop doing so in their homes for 24 or 48 hours before a child visits, Banzhaf said.
In some cases, judges have denied custody to a parent because “the very fact that you would continue smoking around the child, knowing the risk, knowing how widely publicized the risks are, suggests to me a lack of concern” for their health, Banzhaf said.
The legal debate revolves around the protective effects of the vaccines not just for the recipient, but for children and teens around them. Vaccinated people can spread the virus, but health officials have stressed they are much less likely to get infected in the first place, reducing the likelihood they will pass it along.
Rosen, the attorney representing the New York father, argued that even if the father got vaccinated, that would not eliminate the possibility of him getting and transmitting the coronavirus. He also noted that the child goes to day care with other children.
“There’s just so many different ways this child could be exposed to COVID that to single out the father and make his access conditional upon his vaccination status is not only inappropriate, but well beyond any kind of reasonable determination in the best interests of the child,” Rosen said.
Banzhaf argued there was strong evidence for the risks posed to a child by spending time inside with an unvaccinated parent. In fact, he said, “the evidence is far clearer than we used to have with regard to secondhand tobacco smoke” in custody cases.
What will happen for the father in the L.A. County court case remains to be seen. Silberman gave the man roughly a month to provide the documents he requested, which he would review privately.
At the November hearing, Silberman told the father, “I hope you do have a genuine health reason for preventing you from getting” the vaccine. “I just want to know what that is.”

This was totally Predictable, I recommend every person read the Crimson Contagion Functional Exercise of 2019. I did in March 2020.

Best of Health to everyone.

Leave a comment

Filed under "Danger of remaining unvaccinated", "Threat to Childrens Health and Safety, #newsbreak,, Associated Press, “Are the two of you vaccinated?”, “Sir, you better get vaccinated,”, “The court here is stepping in and making a decision for a parent regarding themselves — as a condition to their parental rights.”, California Judicial Branch News Service, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, Citizen Journalist, Coronavirus, COVID-19, Crimson Contagion Exercise 2019, Google, John Myers LATIMES, Judge Matthew F. Cooper, LATIMES Reporter Emily Alpert Reyes, Local Media Consortium, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Harvey A. Silberman, Making San Mateo County Safer, Michael G. Stogner,, Particle Media Inc,, Protect the Children, Protect the Residents of California

Kaylan Charles Freeman in Court July 14, 2021, 9:00 AM

By Michael G. Stogner

Update: 9:00 AM Phone 1-503-300-6847 Code 438807

21-SF-001757-A-HTA | The People of the State of California vs. KAYLAN CHARLES FREEMAN 

21-SF-001757-A | The People of the State of California vs. KAYLAN CHARLES FREEMAN 

This is the Nine Year Rape/Sexual Assault Investigation by San Mateo County Sheriff Office if you believe Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos and Public Information Officer Rosemerry Blankswade.

The Sheriff’s Office had been building the case since 2013 when the first victim in the county came forward. Sheriff’s Office spokeswoman Rosemerry Blankswade said the initial reports were “unfortunately vague or didn’t include a lot of detail.” And it wasn’t until a case linked to Freeman surfaced in a neighboring jurisdiction, coupled with a witness identifying Freeman, that the San Mateo County investigation was reinvigorated.

The Sheriff’s Office claim is that they had no idea who he was until January 2021.

Here is why that statement is Impossible to be true.

On April 3, 2014 at 11:25 AM San Mateo County Sheriff Sergeant Ceferino Gonzales served Kaylan Charles Freeman with a Temporary Restraining Order and Notice to Appear in San Mateo County Superior Court on April 17, 2014 in Honorable Judge Joseph Scott’s Courtroom. He was served at the same El Granada residence that he was recently arrested at.

That means Kaylan Freeman was properly served by a SMCSO Sergeant 15 days before the Hearing date.

SMCSO Sergeant C. Gonzales signed the Proof of Service on April 18, 2014 one day after the Hearing was removed from Calendar reason NO PROOF OF SERVICE FILED.

Proof of Service is a very important part of the Legal Process. It not rocket science the server must by at least 18 years old, the person being served must be served at least 5 days before the hearing date, and Proof of Service must be filed with the Court before the Hearing date in order to proceed.

Why did SMCSO Sergeant Gonzales sign the POS the day after the Hearing date?

Why did SMCSO Sergeant Gonzales file it with the Court 5 days after he signed it?

How many San Mateo County young girls and young women have been Raped and or Sexually Assaulted since 2012 because of the Sheriff’s Office reckless regard for their safety.

Kaylan Charles Freeman is in SMC Jail on $5,250,000.00 Bail.

Attorney General Rob Bonta should add this to his long list of things to do.

Note: For those of you who would like to listen, I will publish the Phone number and Code on this article as soon as it is known which Courtroom is hearing this case.


Filed under #newsbreak,, Bay Area Transparency, Bay Cities News Foundation, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, California Judicial Branch News Service, Citizen Journalist, Coronavirus,, Just because somebody says something is True doesn't mean that it is., Kaylan Charles Freeman, Local Media Consortium,, Michael G. Stogner, New Media Investment Group,,, Nobody is above the Law except "Those Who Matter", Police Officers Committing Crimes,, Protect the Children, Public Corruption, Recordings of Court Cases Must be Allowed, San Mateo County District Attorney Inspector Jordan Boyd, San Mateo County District Attorney Office, San Mateo County, San Mateo County Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos, sanfrancisco.cbslocal, Single Point Data Base for Whistleblowers, SMC Brady Officers, SMCSO Det. Rosemerry Blankswade, SMCSO Sergeant Ceferino J. Gonzales, Telephone Public Access Discontinued by Who knows Who., The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect, Those Who Matter, Victim's Advocate, Yahoo, Yahoo Search