Rishi Kumar was the only politician that had the fortitude to not only stand up for me when the ridiculous accusations were made against me, but he actually showed up in the court room to demand the charges be dropped. If he’s willing to go that far to help a stranger in a far-off state, he’s going to work even harder for you, in yours. I believe in Rishi, and you should too. Mark Racop, licensed 1966 Batmobile replica seller and builder.
I hope this is helpful in your campaign.
To the Batmobile
Mark Racop, Owner Fiberglass Freaks
Did any other Elected Official or Candidate for any office bother to make a simple phone call to Mark Racop to express his/her outrage as to the Abuse of Power by San Mateo County Employees?
The residents should ask, Who in the H–L, Hired Andrew Armando as a Captain at BPD.
I’m sure whoever hired him knew that and they didn’t care.
San Mateo County News.com has been writing about the San Mateo County Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez Criminal case for 8 years now. I’ve said many times that SMCSO Detective Andrew Armando is one of a group of Law Enforcement Officers who committed acts against Deputy Juan P. Lopez.
Civil Rights Attorney Tony Serra has filed documents with the court in San Mateo County in the Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez case NF-433910 stating that Andrew Armando has committed PERJURY to obtain a Search Warrant.
A simple Google Search by whoever is responsible for the hire would have showed that.
Congratulations Belmont, you now have a Captain on your Police Department who can not TESTIFY in any cases.
The timing of this hire is perfect more the 5,000,000 views and 21,000 comments on the San Mateo County Public Corruption cases thanks to the Batmobile Case Involving SMC Sheriff’s Office. San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office, San Mateo County Counsel’s Office, The 5 San Mateo County Supervisors and some Judges. About a month after San Mateo County Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos has his own Criminal Defense Attorney of course paid for by SMC TAXPAYERS.
Thanks goes out to ABC 7 I-TEAM Investigative Reporter Dan Noyes for Breaking the Abuse of Authority/Power and Public Corruption in San Mateo County and putting the Spotlight on SMC.
A bromance is a very close and non-sexual relationship between two or more men. It is an exceptionally tight, affectional, homosocial male bonding relationship exceeding that of usual friendship, and is distinguished from normal friendship by a particularly high level of emotional intimacy.
You knew on June 7, 2022 Election day that this special relationship was over.
That same day, Atherton, and San Mateo County was about to have the National Attention it so well deserves, a Criminal Case filed in San Mateo County Courts, that normally wouldn’t even get one tweet about got more than 5,000,0000 VIEWS thanks to ABC 7 Investigative Reporter Dan Noyes.
The Batmobile Case 22-SF-008723-A | The People of the State of California vs. MARK RACOP
Not the former San Mateo County Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez Criminal Case which has still never made it in front of a Jury yet. 8 YEARS of LIES by the SMC Government. 15-SF-001819-E | The People of the State of California vs. JUAN PABLO LOPEZ, People vs. Juan Pablo Lopez case NF433910A, SF395377F | The People of the State of California vs. JUAN PABLO LOPEZ. You would think a San Mateo County Superior Court Judge committing PERJURY would get National Attention, It didn’t.
Not the Edais Family vs. San Mateo County Coroner Robert Foucralt case, 21-CIV-04737 | MUSTAFA EDAIS, et al vs. ROBERT FAUCRAULT, et al
Not even the Zain Jaffer case: People vs. Zainali Jaffer 17NF012415A got this much attention.
Why would San Mateo County Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos need to hire a New Attorney at all? He has stated he did nothing wrong and he would do it again for any resident of San Mateo County.
Attorney James Touchstone represents Bolanos and called the investigation a political overreach because there is no evidence the sheriff had done something wrong and did not fall into the San Mateo County Board of Supervisor’s Aug. 30 decision to hire an independent investigator.
“This makes no fiscal or legal sense,” Touchstone said. “The board has no say in how the Sheriff’s Office is run.”
San Mateo County Government has been wasting Taxpayer for the last 22 years that I’m aware of, I’ve never heard James Touchstone ever be concerned about it before.
For those who have taken the time to VIEW the Government’s Video, KNOW that Sandra Lee Harmon R.I.P. was EXECUTED by San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office Employees on May 5, 2020 in Half Moon Bay, California.
The AXON LOG RECORDS contain the DATA from ALL devices involved. These RECORDS are paid for by the TAXPAYERS. Their sole purpose is to CONFIRM Law Enforcement’s and The Government’s VERSION/STORY of the HOMICIDE.
Do you notice the shotgun on the ground?
Do you notice Sandra Lee Harmon is UNARMED?
Do you notice the photo is blurry? that means it has been edited/altered. By WHO?
Omitted from the description is SHOTS being fired at Sandra Lee Harmon.
Sanda Lee Harmon had 3 FATAL SHOTS to the BACK
IMHO I would say that San Mateo County Counsel Attorney David Silberman is the person MOST responsible for the AXON LOG RECORDS in the Sandra Lee Harmon Execution on May 5, 2020 in Half Moon Bay, California, NOT being made available to the PUBLIC. Mr. Silberman is an AT-Will Employee.
I would have FIRED him many years ago.
San Mateo County News.com ZOOM meetings Tuesday September 6, 2022 The Public is INVITED and WELCOME.
Michael Stogner is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.
Topic: Michael Stogner’s Zoom Meeting
Time: Sep 6, 2022 12:00 PM Pacific Time (US and Canada)
Today 5 PM FOSTER CITY, LEO RYAN R.I.P. PARK, Join BRENT TURNER the Real Activist and many other Good and Decent People to express their opinions against this $90,000.00 approved expense to EXECUTE 100 Geese living in Foster City by spinal dislocation aka Neck Breaking/Snapping. This sounds like LYNCHING doesn’t it, same result this method includes pulling the neck to sever the spine. Sam Hindi thinks this is a great idea, Richa Awasthi, Sanjay Gehani,Jon Froomin voted for this. That means Politicians voted to Execute this Geese.
The title sounds like the beginning of a Joke doesn’t it. It’s not. San Mateo County Gang activity has a light shining on it like never before. More than 5 Million Views and over 20,000 comments in just 2 weeks time. Many of the comments want Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos and District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe to resign. They are calling for criminal charges against the Sheriff, and forfeiture of his pension.
How many San Mateo County Elected Officials think Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos and District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe should resign? “Therein lies the problem”
Some of you might recall that I personally asked Sheriff Greg Munks and UnderSheriff Carlos G. Bolanos to resign for their behavior on April 21, 2007. They didn’t and not one San Mateo County Elected Official made the same request after the April 21, 2007 activity.
The Batmobile Case
Comment: The Almanac
Posted by Jake Leone a resident of Menlo Park: other on Aug 18, 2022 at 12:57 pm Jake Leone is a registered user. Anagnostou knew this was a civil case the DA told him this the first time he filed a criminal complaint. In California, if you file a false police report, you can get 6 months in jail, a hefty fine, and have to pay restitution to the county, for all expenses, official hours, and any damages as a result of your crime. Knowing the case was strictly civil, Mr. Anagnostou filed a 2nd complaint using with untruthful information, that may well constitute a crime in California, Wagstaffe should be investigating this and issue a public warning/citation to all relevant parties. Anagnostou should at least be cited in this case. The reason is that Mr. Racop could file a massive lawsuit against San Mateo county. That lawsuit would continue to cost county taxpayers a lot of money,possibly millions fighting it and settling it. If Anagnostou is properly cited as having violated California law, San Mateo could deflect some of the cost of the lawsuit and any settlement to Anagnostou. Obviously, it might “Feel” like getting ripped off. But Mr. Anagnostou was not ripped off. This was all part of the agreement that he signed. He failed to make payments, then demanded the car be delivered, he used the Sheriff’s department as an enforcer. Anagnostou used the Sheriff’s department to extort and defraud Mr. Racop. The optics are not the problem. We see the problem clearly because it has exposed serious flaws in San Mateo country law enforcement community that need to be rectified. We can’t let our police be weaponized to become extra-judicial enforcers in what was then known to all parties to be nothing but a civil dispute. That Mr. Anagnostou was free to pursue in the civil courts. As far as we can tell, the car was under production, and probably would have been delivered by now except for the criminal complaints and lawsuits by Mr. Anagnostou, as Mr. Racop was unsure whether to proceed with the build or if a court was going to order that he cancel the job and pay back Mr. Anagnostou.
Comment from PADP August 20, 2022
Jake_Leone says: AUGUST 20, 2022 9:06 AM AT 9:06 AM Mr. Racop was following the terms of the contract signed by Mr. Anagnostou. Mr. Anagnostou failed to fully pay for the car, but then demanded that Mr. Racop either return the money or the car. Mr. Racop was under no obligation, at that point, to do either, as the money had already been committed. Mr. Anagnostou complained to the DA, and the DA said it was civil case. Mr. Anagnostou then filed a civil case, and was obliged to follow that civil case up in the appropriate court system, in Indiana. Mr Anagnostou became impatient (though the car was halfway done, per the contract). And asked his friend, Sheriff Bolanos, to go and Intimidate Mr. Racop. The Sheriff then rammed an affidavit through the DA’s office. Mr. Anagnostou knew this was an unfinished civil case, he didn’t want to deal with the civil courts, so he weaponized the police and used them as a way to extort Mr. Racop. In California, if you file a false police report, the penalty is 6 months in jail, a hefty fine, and restitution to the government for costs incurred. Why is no one talking about the case this way? Because the DA and Sheriff are all friends and friends with Mr. Anagnostou. The Board of Supervisors is playing a dangerous game, clearly the law has been broken, not by Mr. Racop but by Mr. Anagnostou and our County Sheriff. This opens up the possibility that San Mateo county could face a big civil torte suite from Mr. Racop, over the weaponizing of Sheriff’s department, to extort money and property from Mr. Racop, and by endangering Mr. Racop’s health from the horrid stress of this incident. The DA should promptly dismiss this case. Issue a citation to Mr. Anagnostou. And deflect any lawsuits, using that citation, as this could be considered the result of a crime by Mr. Anagnostou. Keep in mind, nothing is moving until Mr. Racop knows whether the civil court will direct him to pay back Mr. Anagnostou, or to finish the car, or give the car to Mr. Anagnostou as-is. And that has been the case for more than a year now. So the best way to resolve this is to either settle this out of court or be patient and let Mr. Racop finish this build.
San Mateo County Residents and Taxpayers should be asking the FIVE Supervisors why NONE of them are thinking like Jake Leone.