Holy Organized Crime and Corruption in San Mateo County Government exposed properly.
This is going to be good, Mark Racop is an honest hard working businessman in Indiana who makes the 1966 Batmobile.
He has a court appearance August 19, 2022 at 9:00AM The “Those Who Matter Gang” has made sure he has to appear in court in PERSON. That is just one of the many tools they have access too, the ability to destroy your finances.
The Gang thinks it’s funny to show up at your business in another State, send all your employees home, put you in handcuffs, transport you to the local Sheriff’s Office then release you and let you know you have been Criminally Charged in San Mateo County, California.
He has had his Bank Account Frozen by the San Mateo County Law Enforcement Gang.
He has had his Google Data searched by the San Mateo County Law Enforcement Gang.
I have recommended this case be DISMISSED ASAP, Just like the ZAIN JAFFER case was. You will remember Mr. Jaffer was arrested by the Hillsborough Police Department at 4:00AM for Attempted Murder of his 3 year old son and 6 or 7 other Felony charges. The entire Criminal Case was quietly dismissed after a Magical Meeting. People vs. Zainali Jaffer 17NF012415A
This criminal case against Mark Racop should have NEVER been filed in the first place. How many San Mateo County Elected Officials and Employees were involved? That is the story.
The Hotels in San Mateo County should be comping Mark Racop today if they haven’t tried already, he should plan to stay a couple of days and get to know the San Mateo County Residents, take a tour of the Town of Atherton, where this story begins.
Residents could meet Mark Racop at the airport when his plane arrives, Come to his court appearance at 400 County Center, Redwood City California, possibly a PARADE.
This one case demonstrates what I and many others have been reporting to the proper authorities for more than 22 years. This is a perfect example of Organized Crime in San Mateo County Government.
“Thrown Out” is not a legal term and I would not have used it, if DDA Kimberly Perrotti had not said it in court.
Yesterday was a first for me in 22 years observing and reporting of SMC Courts. San Mateo County District Attorney Deputy Kimberly Perrotti informed the court that she had personally contacted the Santa Clara County District Attorney’s prosecutor who was trying a case that Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez’s Co-Counsel Erica Elizabeth Treeby was the defense attorney in. She reported to Judge Scott that Ms. Treeby would be available on March 17, 2022 in SMC, because of this alleged conversation. She did not identify this person, and this person has not been called to testify about this alleged conversation and there was no declaration filed.
I think it would be great for the public to know about that entire conversation from start to finish.
I would like to know how many times DDA Kimberly Perrotti has checked up on the Defense Attorneys opposing her?
Remember this is a Political Prosecution of Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez it’s that simple. Photo below is from 2014. You do the math for lost wages and cost to Defend against these False Charges, that were “THROWN OUT”
How many of you think Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez is guilty of this Smuggling Case?
03/08/2022 Continued Jury Trial Judicial Officer Scott, Joseph C. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
Comment Motions
03/08/2022 Continued Jury Trial Original Type Continued Jury Trial Judicial Officer Scott, Joseph C. Hearing Time 09:30 AM Result Held Comment Motions Parties Present Defendant: LOPEZ, JUAN PABLO Attorney: SERRA, J. TONY
03/08/2022 Party appeared by audio and/or video
03/08/2022 Motion denied. Comment Moving party: People’s Motion title: Additional Motion in Limine #10 – Exclude reference to dismiss counts and charges
03/08/2022 Motion denied Comment WITHOUT PREJUDICE Moving party: People’s Motion title: Additional Motion in Limine #11 – Based on the court’s ruling on motion #10 above, refer to the remaining counts submitted to the jury as “first count”, “second count” etc. rather than “count 1”, “count 3”, etc.
03/17/2022 Continued Jury Trial Judicial Officer Scott, Joseph C. Hearing Time 09:30 AM Comment Motion to Continue Trial
03/21/2022 Continued Jury Trial Judicial Officer Scott, Joseph C. Hearing Time 09:00 AM Comment Jury Selections
This was changed after SMCN.com article was published. This is just one example of the Odyssey Official Records are only as good as the entry from the Court Clerk.
03/08/2022 Minutes corrected as follows: Comment Modification: MIL #10 GRANTED By: K. Bihl Today’s Date: 3/9/2022
VC23222(a)-INF-Possession of Open Container While Driving
Not Guilty
004
VC23222(b)(1)-INF-Possession Of Marijuana In Open Container While Driving
Not Guilty
002
VC23550-PR-Prior – Driving Under the Influence within Ten Years of Three other Dui Violations
Deny
Next Court Date 01/04/2022 Preliminary Hearing 9:00 AM
Aldon Smith was arrested on Farm Hill Blvd, Redwood City on December 6, 2021 by the CHP for DUI causing personal injury, he was involved in a 2 vehicle accident at 2:17 PM. He refused a breath/blood test. By refusing to provide Breath/Blood samples, Those of Us who don’t Matter lose our California Drivers License for a period of 1 year. Not sure what if anything happened to his Drivers License.
He was booked into Maquire Correctional Facilities at 7:38 PM. Where was he for 5 hours and 21 minutes?
According to District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe, He later provided a blood sample and tested .2 blood alcohol level. How much later? What time was this test taken? Had he already contacted his defense attorney Josh Bentley by then?
The San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office has NO Press Release or News Release of his arrest. Why?
Today December 22, 2021 Courtroom 8B at 9:00AM Hon. Judge Chinhayi C. Cadet for Arraignment
SMCCCD Vice Chancellor Jose D. Nunez has been charged with 15 Felony counts, including Embezzlement and PERJURY. He has not been arrested yet. Why? also PER DA AND DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY’S REQUEST. NTA MAY NOT REACH DEFENDANT IN TIME. NTA= Notice to appear, Mr. Nunez might not even know he has been invited to show up in court today. Very casual for a 2.5 year Criminal Investigation. How much did the 2.5 year Investigation cost SMC Taxpayer? Lets compare that to the final outcome of this case, which will most likely never get to a Jury Trial.
Just because a person is criminally charged with a crime in San Mateo County doesn’t mean that he or she is guilty. Look no further than Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez case NF433910A or the Sheriff Activities League (SAL) Embezzlement and Money Laundering case.
The Public is invited to attend in person by Hon. Judge Leland Davis III. Up until November 22, 2021 the public which includes reporters were able to Listen to the Hearing by calling this number 503-300-6847 Code 438807. Remember there is a Pandemic in the world including San Mateo County.
Public Access Policy Updated 11/22/21 – The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect; proceedings are open to the public to attend in person.
I have recommended a Single Point Data Base to San Mateo County Government (SUPERVISORS) for 20 years. Just think how much time and money it would have saved if it caught the alleged Felony on 3/4/2009. Also it would be helpful if the District Attorney’s Office charge all people equally, for example if a Judge, a court clerk, and a court reporter committed a Felony, it would go a long way for Public Trust if they were arrested, charged, and prosecuted. Here are the current charges in the Nunez case.
From today’s hearing:
Disposition Events
12/22/2021Plea
Judicial Officer Cadet, Chinhayi C.
001
PC424(a)-FEL-Public Officer Crime
Not Guilty
001
PC803(c)-ENH-Special Allegation-Statute Of Limitations-Late Discovery (Zamora Allegation)
Not Guilty
002
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
003
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
004
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
005
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
006
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
007
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
008
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
009
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
010
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
011
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
012
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
013
PC118(a)-FEL-Perjury By Declaration
Not Guilty
013
PC803(c)-ENH-Special Allegation-Statute Of Limitations-Late Discovery (Zamora Allegation)
Not Guilty
014
EC7054-FEL- Use of School District or College District Funds for Political Purposes
Not Guilty
014
PC803(c)-ENH-Special Allegation-Statute Of Limitations-Late Discovery (Zamora Allegation)
Not Guilty
015
EC7054-FEL- Use of School District or College District Funds for Political Purposes
Not Guilty
Events and Hearings
12/16/2021 Efiling – Initial
12/16/2021 New Filed Case
12/16/2021 Notice to Appear sent to defendant
12/22/2021 Arraignment
Original TypeArraignmentJudicial OfficerCadet, Chinhayi C.Hearing Time9:00 AMResultArraignedCommentPER DA AND DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY’S REQUEST. NTA MAY NOT REACH DEFENDANT IN TIME.
Parties Present
Defendant: Nunez, Jose DAttorney: AGRE, LYN R
12/22/2021 Advisement of Rights
12/22/2021 Arraignment waived on complaint
12/22/2021 Time waiver for preliminary hearing.
Comment Defendant personally waived time for 10 court days and 60 calendar days for the preliminary hearing.
12/22/2021 Defendant ordered to return.
01/05/2022 Superior Court Review
Judicial Officer(s) Greenberg, Susan, Southern Superior Court Review, –Hearing Time1:30 PMComment and To Set Prelim
Zain JafferD.A. Stephen M. WagstaffeKaren Guidotti
Upadte: This Motion to Destroy has been continued to January 3, 2022
Today December 20, 2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2A the Hon Judge Barbara Mallach will rule on a Motion to Destroy all of the records in the People vs. Zainali Jaffer case 17NF012415A. The Public is invited to attend in person.
Who filed the Motion to Destroy all records and Body Worn Camera Video?
I call this the “Magic Case” because of the “Magic Meeting” held on June 7, 2018
Who is speaking for the two Children?
Diminished Capacity is No Excuse for Criminal Conduct
This case should be taught at every law school in the United States of America. NOT Destroyed.
Zain Jaffer the other day I wrote about you assisting Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez with his 7 year legal defense expenses now over $300,000, and I see that tomorrow David Khan of Daly City has a court appearance in front of Hon. Judge Barbara Mallach in Courtroom 2A at 10:00 AM just like you do. David Khan would be another person I recommend to you for your help. The other three families mentioned above have lost loved ones to Homicides by San Mateo County Law Enforcement. They could use you help against the Government in those cases.
Your prepared statement that you read when your case was Dismissed, July 2, 2018
“I was incredibly fortunate that I was able to defend myself through the legal system, but I am aware that many others are not. Moving forward, I plan on examining ways that I can help others who are innocent and are seeking to obtain justice.”
In the last 3.5 years I have not seen anyone that you have helped or even asked about for that matter.
Thank You, in advance for considering these cases. If interested I have many more cases for you.
Update: This Motion to Destroy Records has been continued to January 3, 2022
Dear Attorney General Rob Bonta,
Please don’t forget Zain Jaffer was arrested by the Hillsborough Police Department on October 15, 2017 for Attempted Murder of a child, There is Body Worn Camera Video.
Tomorrow December 20, 2021 Superior Court of California County of San Mateo in Courtroom 2A at 10:00 AM the Hon. Judge Barbara Mallach has a Motion to Destroy all the records in the Zain Jaffer case 17NF012415A.
Destroying the Records and Evidence is Not in the Public’s Interest.
These records could be very valuable to the wife and children in the future.
Diminished Capacity is No Excuse for Criminal Conduct.
Yahoo/Inbox
Karen Guidotti <kguidotti@smcgov.org> To: Michael Stogner Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 6:39 AM·
The meeting was on Thursday, June 7.·
Deputy District Attorney Sharon Cho, Deputy District Attorney Sean Gallagher and I attended along with the following people from the defense team: Attorney Patrick Clancy, attorney Daniel Olmos, Dr. Eric Wexler and Dr. George Woods.·
The meeting lasted 1 and ½ hours; Ms. Cho and the defense team remained in the meeting room after Mr. Gallagher and I left. I do not know how much longer they stayed.·
Yes, we viewed the body camera footage.
From: Michael Stogner [mailto:michaelgstogner@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2018 9:02 AM To: Karen Guidotti <kguidotti@smcgov.org> Subject: Zain Jaffer case Hello Karen, What date did the defense team for Zain Jaffer make the presentation in the District Attorney’s Office? Who attended? How long was that meeting? Were HPD body camera videos looked at or discussed?
Update: This Motion to Destroy Records has been Continued to January 3, 2022
I think in the Interest of Fair Play and Level Playing Field, Judge Barbara Mallach should deny this motion for now. The Records are already SEALED, what is the hurry?
Diminished Capacity is no Excuse for Criminal Conduct.
Judge Mallach, I don’t know if this matters to you or not but the Hillsborough Police Chief stands by his Officers arrest including the Attempted Murder charge.
I’m not saying there is any connection here, just Somebody filed this motion to SEAL and DESTROY ARREST & RELATED RECORDS of Zain Jaffer, On November 18, 2021 and 3 days later all courtroom telephone public access got cancelled.
Public Access Policy Updated 11/22/21 – The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect; proceedings are open to the public to attend in person.
11/18/2021 Petition to Seal and Destroy Arrest Record Filed (PC 851.8) Comment CR-409 Petition to Seal Arrest & Related Records PC 851.91
12/20/2021 Motion hearings Judicial Officer Mallach, Barbara J. Hearing Time 10:00 AM
Courtroom 2A
Comment PC 851.91
The Short list of who wants these records Destroyed is the San Mateo County Government and of course Zain Jaffer and his Defense Team.
This case was Very Fast from start to finish, How and Why?
Just because somebody says something is true, doesn’t mean that it is.
As it turns out a San Mateo County Resident was arrested and Criminally Charged with three Felony Sexual Assault counts Bail was $500,000 and 47 days later his case is complete all the Sexual Assault charges are dismissed. This would be a good case for an AUDIT to simply find out what really happened. Was a man falsely charged in the first place? There is No Comment from Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos about his Sheriff Investigators and their work on this case. What are their thoughts?
Sean Gallagher and Steve Wagstaffe offered Mr. Banister to reduce this case to 1 count a Misdemeanor, Why? and Why so fast?
San Mateo County Sheriff Office arrested Mr. Banister on August 31, 2021 after Investigating the Sexual Assault allegations. The Investigation started on August 2, 2021, A Judge issued a $500,000 Warrant for his arrest based on the SMCSO work product.
San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office filed the charges below on November 1, 2021, that’s 2 months after his arrest. So the District Attorney’s Office had two months to review the SMCSO Investigators work and they confirmed the three Felony sexual assault charges on an 11 year old victim.
On November 30, 2021 this offer was read in court, that is 29 days after the charges were approved and filed, What changed? What Happened?
I was not able to report what the District Attorney’s Offer was on November 30, 2021 because I was not sitting in the Courtroom. Also not in the Courtroom that morning was defendant Michael D. Banister and his defense attorney Joseph Goethals. They appeared by zoom or phone.
Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo Presiding Judge Leland Davis III cancelled the Public Access by Telephone on November 22, 2021. He has never explained Why? It can’t be because it’s safe to attend court in person now, So it must be some other really Important reason.
“The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect; proceedings are open to the public to attend in person.“
The San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office has a Victim’s Advocate. Did the Victim’s Advocate meet with the child and did he/she agree with this offer?
Did the parents of the victim agree with the offer?
Does anybody wonder why Sexual Assault Victims don’t want to report the crimes.
Does San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office ever charge somebody with crimes they know they did not commit? Of course they do, look no further than People vs. Juan Pablo Lopez case NF433910A
Is that what happened is this case? I don’t know. Somebody reported a crime, the Sheriff’s Office Investigated and so did the District Attorney’s Office. They called the 11 year old girl a Victim.
How is it possible for these charges to be DISMISSED?
Remember a person is innocent until proven Guilty.
Mr. Jaffer said he appreciates that justice was served in his case and that he wants to help other people who find themselves in similar situations. “I was incredibly fortunate that I was able to defend myself through the legal system, but I am aware that many others are not. Moving forward, I plan on examining ways that I can help others who are innocent and are seeking to obtain justice.”
Mr. Jaffer I had hoped to see you sooner, that has not happened yet, let me bring the People vs. Juan Pablo Lopez case NF433910A to your attention, I think this case is exactly what you were talking about when you made your statement in a Superior Court of California County of San Mateo.
Just to refresh your memory, San Mateo County Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez was arrested 7 years ago at gun point at one of his homes in front of his son. He was falsely charged with Smuggling a Cellphone and Drugs to a Hells Angel Gang Member who was an inmate in the Redwood City Jail, so both of you know what the inside of that jail looks like.
The Sheriff Deputy Juan P. Lopez case is the perfect example of Organized Crime and Corruption that I have witnessed in the last 20 years. As you can imagine the personal humiliation of being arrested twice, falsely charged, the cost for Attorneys for 7 years, and the loss of Income for 7 years.
Most recently Hon. Judge Joseph Scott, Court Clerk Kimberly Bihl and Court Reporter Jocelyne Fakhouri conspired to commit a crime and then did. PC115(a)
Also most recently Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo Presiding Judge Leland Davis III issued a policy change for Public Access by Telephone.
Public Access Policy Updated 11/22/21 – The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect; proceedings are open to the public to attend in person.
This policy change is most likely connected to the Juan P. Lopez criminal case and the RECORDING from July 27, 2021 which PROVES a Judge, a Court Clerk, and Court Reporter committed a Felony.
Mr. Jaffer, I know you are busy, Thank You, for considering this as one of your cases to help.
San Mateo County News 