Another San Mateo County Family Law Case to watch is the Shoshana Diengott Case. What makes this Family Law Case stand out is the Cooperation between the Attorney Steven Montalvo, San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office and the San Mateo County District Attorneys Office in causing 3 Criminal Charges for violating a DV Restraining Order. Between Shoshana and her someday ex Husband over 100 phone calls were made to the Moss Beach Sheriff Substation. That Fact right there should have been a Huge RED FLAG to everyone involved that there is a much bigger problem here.
I am a San Mateo County citizen, resident and taxpayer.
San Mateo County should not investigate the 10 million dollars worth of P.P.E. / Protective Personal Equipment that was damaged by negligence, boxes outside for several months not protected from the elements or persons. I am grateful that this story was reported by ABC / KGO TV. The Federal government should be the agency that investigates the wrongdoing of San Mateo County, and the San Mateo County Manager Mike Callagy.
How many Children under the age of FIVE live in San Mateo County?
From Today’s San Mateo Daily Journal Article Hospitalizations Spiking in SMC.
“We’re not shutting down, society is not shutting down but COVID is out there.”
“I don’t want people to be alarmed. We can take care of those we need to take care of right now,” County Manager Mike Callagy said.
“So far, we’ve been able to manage. I expect we’ll be able to manage through this and we hope the peak is on the horizon here,” Callagy said,
This sounds like Rosanne Faust back in March of 2020.
‘Just facts on virus, not fear’: SAMCEDA aims to educate – San …
https://www.smdailyjournal.com › coronavirus › just-facts…Mar 13, 2020 — Facts about the coronavirus, not fear, is the goal of San Mateo County Economic Development Association, executive Rosanne Foust says.
This was Predictable it’s going to get worse.
Google Search the Crimson Contagion Functional Exercise 2019
UPDATED DECEMBER 30, 2021 COVID-Related Rescheduling of Hearings Temporary Courtroom Closure 1/3/2022 through 1/14/2022: Please click here for more information. CIVIL EX PARTES: Pursuant to Emergency Local Rule 3-101, effective January 1, 2022, all ex partes in civil law and motion matters are temporarily suspended until further order of the Court. Please click here for Civil Division information: http://www.sanmateocourt.org/court_divisions/civil/. CRIMINAL: All Preliminary Hearings currently scheduled between 1/3/2022 and 1/14/2022 will be heard at the Southern Courthouse at 400 County Center in Redwood City. If your Preliminary Hearing is scheduled for the Northern Courthouse in South San Francisco, you should appear on the same scheduled date and time at 400 County Center in Redwood City, not South San Francisco. Please click here for Criminal Division information: http://www.sanmateocourt.org/court_divisions/criminal/. SMALL CLAIMS: All small claims hearings currently scheduled at 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM between 1/3/2022 and 1/14/2022 will be rescheduled to a later date. A notice of new hearing dates will be mailed to impacted parties. Please click here for Small Claims Division information: http://www.sanmateocourt.org/court_divisions/small_claims/.TRAFFIC: All traffic arraignment and court trial hearings currently scheduled between 1/3/2022 and 1/14/2022 will be rescheduled to a later date. Customers will receive their new date in the mail, sent to the address on the citation. Please click here for Traffic Division information: http://www.sanmateocourt.org/court_divisions/traffic
UPDATED NOVEMBER 22, 2021 Public Access Policy Updated 11/22/21 – The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect; proceedings are open to the public to attend in person.
San Mateo County Superior Court is committed to continuing public access to court proceedings during and after the pandemic emergency. Due to COVID-19 and public health concerns, the Court has shifted to convene some court proceedings remotely in order to eliminate the need for individuals to attend hearings in person. This is to reduce the number of visits by the public to the courthouses, thereby minimizing potential infection of the public and staff.
At this time, members of the public may attend a court proceeding in person. The Court is committed to maintaining a safe workplace for our staff and the public. Each courtroom can accommodate a different number of seats in the audience. You will need to check-in with the bailiff when you enter the courtroom. The bailiff will inform you as to whether or not there is an available seat, or if capacity has been reached. If capacity has been reached, you may remain outside the courtroom until someone leaves. Face coverings are required at all times inside the courthouse.
Zoom may not be used for public access without the approval of the judicial officer.
I’m not saying there is any connection here, just Somebody filed this motion to SEAL and DESTROY ARREST & RELATED RECORDS of Zain Jaffer, On November 18, 2021 and 3 days later all courtroom telephone public access got cancelled.
Public Access Policy Updated 11/22/21 – The listen-only public access lines are no longer in effect; proceedings are open to the public to attend in person.
11/18/2021 Petition to Seal and Destroy Arrest Record Filed (PC 851.8) Comment CR-409 Petition to Seal Arrest & Related Records PC 851.91
12/20/2021 Motion hearings Judicial Officer Mallach, Barbara J. Hearing Time 10:00 AM
Comment PC 851.91
The Short list of who wants these records Destroyed is the San Mateo County Government and of course Zain Jaffer and his Defense Team.
Bianca Fasuescu <email@example.com>To:firstname.lastname@example.orgThu, Dec 16 at 9:59 AM
Dear Mr. Stogner,
The court received the (attached) request, which you submitted pursuant to rule 10.500 of the California Rules of Court, on Tuesday, December 7, 2021.
The court has concluded that processing this request will require additional time and, therefore, is invoking the 14-day extension permitted under rule 10.500. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 10.500(e)(8)(A)–(C).) We estimate we will be able to notify you whether the court has disclosable responsive records by Monday, January 10, 2022.
My records show the document was received on December 6, 2021 at 8:03AM
December 13, 2021 in Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo courtroom 2G, Attorney Tony Serra made the above statement in the People vs. Juan Pablo Lopez case NF433910A. I must admit it was refreshing to hear the truth spoken in a courtroom. Everybody and their mother knows that is true.
San Mateo County Deputy District Attorney Kimberly Perrotti, knows it true, she didn’t object to the statement or ask that it be stricken.
These e-mails show the Special Relationship that existed in April of 2007 and still exist today. San Mateo County District Attorneys James P. Fox and Steve Wagstaffe sent them before San Mateo County Residents ever heard about Operation Dollhouse. They NEVER asked, Why were you two INSIDE that single family residence located at 3474 Eldon Street, Las Vegas, Nevada, on April 21, 2007 @ 9:30PM?
It was either for sex with under aged Human Trafficked Sex Slaves which Munks said they had no intention to pay for, or it was a Drug Deal Busted by the FBI? The SMC Government and the media have never been interested to find out, Why did they go inside that house.