PG&E customers face fourth electricity rate hike this year as California Public Utilities Commission prepares to vote
San Francisco, California – Customers of PG&E are growing more frustrated as another suggested rate hike would raise their electricity costs for the fourth time this year. Next week, the California Public Utilities Commission is scheduled to vote on the plan whereby monthly electricity prices would rise by an extra $6 by year-end.
PG&E made the most recent rate hike request in January. The energy company contends that the extra money is required to pay for around $950 million in damages suffered from extreme winter storms from December 2022 until March 2023. Effectuated on September 1, this follows a 0.5% rate rise.
Residents and advocacy groups are complaining and pointing out the overall financial burden these consecutive increases have put on homes. Consumer advocacy organization the Utility Reform Network (TURN) has been outspoken in its criticism of the rate hikes. Mark Toney, the Executive Director of TURN, underlined the sequence of hikes that have tormented consumers all year long.
Read also: San Mateo County to add deputy district attorney and investigator to tackle wage theft cases
“PG&E customers were hit with a $34 increase at the beginning of the year,” TURN Executive Director Mark Toney said to NBC Bay Area. “Customers were hit with another $4 increase in March. Customers were hit with another increase of at least $6, and there is going to be more before the end of the year.”
PG&E insists that these steps are a part of a larger plan to stabilize finances and lower future expenses despite continuous annoyance. The utility has reported its efforts in applying cost-cutting policies meant to eventually reduce costs. PG&E executives have also highlighted a one-time $55 climate credit set for October and a temporary 9% rate drop starting in July aimed at lessening customer effect. They contend that these programs mean, despite the suggested increase, consumers should generally see a net decrease in their annual bills.
Read also: New Wellness Center in San Mateo County aims to centralize health and social services
Critics, however, remain skeptical. They contend that given the ongoing rate increases—which they see as a recurring problem requiring more significant answers than temporary fixes—the temporary cuts and credits provide little comfort. The conflict between the demand for utility stability and consumer protection keeps growing as the vote draws near, prompting many to question how this balance can be reasonably reached without unnecessarily burdening Californian citizens.
